Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Reliability of Binocular Esterman Visual Field Test in Patients with Glaucoma and Other Ocular Conditions.
Fujimoto, Shuhei; Ikesugi, Kengo; Ichio, Takako; Tanaka, Kohei; Kato, Kumiko; Kondo, Mineo.
Afiliação
  • Fujimoto S; Department of Ophthalmology, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Tsu 514-8507, Japan.
  • Ikesugi K; Department of Ophthalmology, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Tsu 514-8507, Japan.
  • Ichio T; Department of Ophthalmology, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Tsu 514-8507, Japan.
  • Tanaka K; Department of Ophthalmology, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Tsu 514-8507, Japan.
  • Kato K; Department of Ophthalmology, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Tsu 514-8507, Japan.
  • Kondo M; Department of Ophthalmology, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Tsu 514-8507, Japan.
Diagnostics (Basel) ; 14(4)2024 Feb 16.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38396473
ABSTRACT
The binocular Esterman visual field test (EVFT) of 120 points was the first method to quantify the defects in the binocular visual field. It is used in many parts of the world as a standard test to determine whether an individual has the visual capabilities to drive safely. In Japan, it is required for the grading and issuance of visual disability certificates. The purpose of this study was to determine the reliability of the EVFT results. We studied 104 patients who had undergone the binocular EVFT at Mie University Hospital. Their mean age was 68.0 ± 11.4 years, and the best-corrected visual acuity of the better eye was 0.18 ± 0.38 logMAR units. The EVFT was performed twice on the same day, and the results of the first and second tests were compared. The mean Esterman scores for the first and second test were 89.3 ± 30.5 and 89.1 ± 30.2, respectively, and the test times were 338.9 ± 86.8 and 336.7 ± 76.4 s, respectively. The differences were not significant (p = 0.69 and p = 0.33). In the Bland-Altman analyses (second-first test) of the Esterman scores, the mean difference was 0.38 without significant fixed errors (p = 0.20) or proportional errors (p = 0.27). The limits of agreement within the 1.96 standard deviation were -8.96 to +9.45 points. The agreement rate for the most peripheral 24 test points was significantly lower than the agreement rate for the other 96 test points (p < 0.01). The agreement rate of the upper visual field was significantly lower than that of the lower field (p < 0.01). The overall reliability rate of the EVFT is acceptable, but the peripheral and upper test points have relatively low reliability rates. These findings are important for interpretations of the EVFT results.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article