Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
In Silico Comparison of WRKY Transcription Factors in Wild and Cultivated Soybean and Their Co-expression Network Arbitrating Disease Resistance.
Nawaz, Muhammad Amjad; Khalil, Hafiz Kashif; Azeem, Farrukh; Ali, Muhammad Amjad; Pamirsky, Igor Eduardovich; Golokhvast, Kirill S; Yang, Seung Hwan; Atif, Rana Muhammad; Chung, Gyuhwa.
Afiliação
  • Nawaz MA; Advanced Engineering School (Agrobiotek), Tomsk State University, Lenin Ave, 36, Tomsk Oblast, Russia, 634050. amjad_ucauos@yahoo.com.
  • Khalil HK; Center for Research in the Field of Materials and Technologies, Tomsk State University, Tomsk, Russia. amjad_ucauos@yahoo.com.
  • Azeem F; Department of Plant Breeding and Genetics / CAS-AFS, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
  • Ali MA; Department of Bioinformatics and Biotechnology, Government College University Faisalabad (GCUF), Faisalabad, Pakistan.
  • Pamirsky IE; Department of Plant Pathology, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
  • Golokhvast KS; Siberian Federal Scientific Centre of AgrobiotechnologyCentralnaya, Presidium, Krasnoobsk, Russia, 633501.
  • Yang SH; Advanced Engineering School (Agrobiotek), Tomsk State University, Lenin Ave, 36, Tomsk Oblast, Russia, 634050.
  • Atif RM; Siberian Federal Scientific Centre of AgrobiotechnologyCentralnaya, Presidium, Krasnoobsk, Russia, 633501.
  • Chung G; Laboratory of Supercritical Fluid Research and Application in Agrobiotechnology, Tomsk State University, Lenin Str. 36, Tomsk, Russia, 634050.
Biochem Genet ; 2024 Feb 27.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38411942
ABSTRACT
WRKY Transcription factors (TFs) play critical roles in plant defence mechanisms that are activated in response to biotic and abiotic stresses. However, information on the Glycine soja WRKYs (GsoWRKYs) is scarce. Owing to its importance in soybean breeding, here we identified putative WRKY TFs in wild soybean, and compared the results with Glycine max WRKYs (GmaWRKYs) by phylogenetic, conserved motif, and duplication analyses. Moreover, we explored the expression trends of WRKYs in G. max (oomycete, fungi, virus, bacteria, and soybean cyst nematode) and G. soja (soybean cyst nematode), and identified commonly expressed WRKYs and their co-expressed genes. We identified, 181 and 180 putative WRKYs in G. max and G. soja, respectively. Though the number of WRKYs in both studied species is almost the same, they differ in many ways, i.e., the number of WRKYs on corresponding chromosomes, conserved domain structures, WRKYGQK motif variants, and zinc-finger motifs. WRKYs in both species grouped in three major clads, i.e., I-III, where group-II had sub-clads IIa-IIe. We found that GsoWRKYs expanded mostly through segmental duplication. A large number of WRKYs were expressed in response to biotic stresses, i.e., Phakospora pachyrhizi, Phytoplasma, Heterodera glycines, Macrophomina phaseolina, and Soybean mosaic virus; 56 GmaWRKYs were commonly expressed in soybean plants infected with these diseases. Finally, 30 and 63 GmaWRKYs and GsoWRKYs co-expressed with 205 and 123 non-WRKY genes, respectively, indicating that WRKYs play essential roles in biotic stress tolerance in Glycine species.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article