Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Towards a validated glossary of usability attributes for the evaluation of wearable robotic devices.
Herrera-Valenzuela, Diana; Meyer, Jan T; Del-Ama, Antonio J; Moreno, Juan C; Gassert, Roger; Lambercy, Olivier.
Afiliação
  • Herrera-Valenzuela D; International Doctoral School, Rey Juan Carlos University, Madrid, Spain. ds.herrera.2020@alumnos.urjc.es.
  • Meyer JT; Biomechanics and Technical Aids Unit, National Hospital for Paraplegics, Toledo, Spain. ds.herrera.2020@alumnos.urjc.es.
  • Del-Ama AJ; Rehabilitation Engineering Laboratory, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Moreno JC; School of Science and Technology, Department of Applied Mathematics, Materials Science and Engineering and Electronic Technology, Rey Juan Carlos University, Móstoles, Madrid, Spain.
  • Gassert R; Neural Rehabilitation Group, Cajal Institute, CSIC-Spanish National Research Council, Madrid, Spain.
  • Lambercy O; Unit of Neurorehabilitation, Biomechanics and Sensorimotor Function (HNP-SESCAM), Associated Unit of R&D&I to the CSIC, Toledo, Spain.
J Neuroeng Rehabil ; 21(1): 30, 2024 02 28.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38419069
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Despite technical advances in the field of wearable robotic devices (WRD), there is still limited user acceptance of these technologies. While usability often comes as a key factor influencing acceptance, there is a scattered landscape of definitions and scopes for the term. To advance usability evaluation, and to integrate usability features as design requirements during technology development, there is a need for benchmarks and shared terminology. These should be easily accessible and implementable by developers.

METHODS:

An initial set of usability attributes (UA) was extracted from a literature survey on usability evaluation in WRD. The initial set of attributes was enriched and locally validated with seven developers of WRD through an online survey and a focus group. The locally validated glossary was then externally validated through a globally distributed online survey.

RESULTS:

The result is the Robotics Usability Glossary (RUG), a comprehensive glossary of 41 UA validated by 70 WRD developers from 17 countries, ensuring its generalizability. 31 of the UA had high agreement scores among respondents and 27 were considered highly relevant in the field, but only 11 of them had been included as design criteria by the respondents.

CONCLUSIONS:

Multiple UA ought to be considered for a comprehensive usability assessment. Usability remains inadequately incorporated into device development, indicating a need for increased awareness and end-user perspective. The RUG can be readily accessed through an online platform, the Interactive Usability Toolbox (IUT), developed to provide context-specific outcome measures and usability evaluation methods. Overall, this effort is an important step towards improving and promoting usability evaluation practices within WRD. It has the potential to pave the way for establishing usability evaluation benchmarks that further endorse the acceptance of WRD.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Robótica / Dispositivos Eletrônicos Vestíveis Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Robótica / Dispositivos Eletrônicos Vestíveis Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article