Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The Myriad Decision at 10.
Sherkow, Jacob S; Cook-Deegan, Robert; Greely, Henry T.
Afiliação
  • Sherkow JS; College of Law and European Union Center, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, Illinois, USA; email: jsherkow@illinois.edu.
  • Cook-Deegan R; Carle Illinois College of Medicine and Carl R. Woese Institute for Genomic Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, USA.
  • Greely HT; Center for Advanced Study in Biomedical Innovation Law, Faculty of Law, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet ; 25(1): 397-419, 2024 Aug.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38424474
ABSTRACT
A decade ago, the US Supreme Court decided Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc., concluding that isolated genes were not patentable subject matter. Beyond being a mere patent dispute, the case was a political and cultural phenomenon, viewed as a harbinger for the health of the biotechnology industry. With a decade of perspective, though, Myriad's impact seems much narrower. The law surrounding patentable subject matter-while greatly transformed-only centered on Myriad in small part. The case had only a modest impact on patenting practices both in and outside the United States. And persistent efforts to legislatively overturn the decision have not borne fruit. The significance of Myriad thus remains, even a decade later, hidden by larger developments in science and law that have occurred since the case was decided.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Patentes como Assunto Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Patentes como Assunto Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article