Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Supported decision-making interventions in mental healthcare: A systematic review of current evidence and implementation barriers.
Francis, Cathy J; Johnson, Amanda; Wilson, Rhonda L.
Afiliação
  • Francis CJ; University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Johnson A; Head of School, Dean of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Wilson RL; University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.
Health Expect ; 27(2): e14001, 2024 04.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38433012
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

There is a growing momentum around the world to foster greater opportunities for the involvement of mental health service users in their care and treatment planning. In-principle support for this aim is widespread across mental healthcare professionals. Yet, progress in mental health services towards this objective has lagged in practice.

OBJECTIVES:

We conducted a systematic review of quantitative, qualitative and mixed-method research on interventions to improve opportunities for the involvement of mental healthcare service users in treatment planning, to understand the current research evidence and the barriers to implementation.

METHODS:

Seven databases were searched and 5137 articles were screened. Articles were included if they reported on an intervention for adult service users, were published between 2008 and October 2023 and were in English. Evidence in the 140 included articles was synthesised according to the JBI guidance on Mixed Methods Systematic Reviews.

RESULTS:

Research in this field remains exploratory in nature, with a wide range of interventions investigated to date but little experimental replication. Overarching barriers to shared and supported decision-making in mental health treatment planning were (1) Organisational (resource limitations, culture barriers, risk management priorities and structure); (2) Process (lack of knowledge, time constraints, health-related concerns, problems completing and using plans); and (3) Relationship barriers (fear and distrust for both service users and clinicians).

CONCLUSIONS:

On the basis of the barriers identified, recommendations are made to enable the implementation of new policies and programs, the designing of new tools and for clinicians seeking to practice shared and supported decision-making in the healthcare they offer. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION This systematic review has been guided at all stages by a researcher with experience of mental health service use, who does not wish to be identified at this point in time. The findings may inform organisations, researchers and practitioners on implementing supported decision-making, for the greater involvement of people with mental ill health in their healthcare.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Tomada de Decisão Clínica / Serviços de Saúde Mental Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Tomada de Decisão Clínica / Serviços de Saúde Mental Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article