[Clinical significance of negative fluid balance and infection management in the treatment of acute respiratory distress syndrome caused by severe novel coronavirus infection].

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To explore the clinical significance of negative fluid balance and infection management in the treatment of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) caused by severe novel coronavirus infection. METHODS: A retrospective survey was conducted. Patients with ARDS caused by severe novel coronavirus infection who were hospitalized in the department of critical care medicine of the Third Affiliated Hospital of Gansu University of Chinese Medicine and received non-invasive ventilator assisted ventilation were selected as the research objects. The fluid intake and output of all patients were accurately counted every day, and the fluid intake of the next day was adjusted according to the output of the previous day. According to the fluid negative balance, and whether the hospital infection management measures were complied with during the treatment and inspection of the patients, 45 patients with a negative fluid balance of more than 200 mL/d and strict management of nosocomial infection were taken as the observation group, and 48 patients with a negative fluid balance of less than 200 mL/d and no strict management of nosocomial infection were taken as the control group. The general data, weaning success rate, endotracheal intubation rate, mortality, as well as laboratory indicators such as white blood cell count (WBC), procalcitonin (PCT), C-reactive protein (CRP) after treatment were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in gender (male 51.1% vs. 52.1%), age (years old 66.31±15.92 vs. 67.50±13.59), acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE II 18.98±4.81 vs. 18.54±4.35) between the observation group and the control group (all P > 0.05), indicating that the baseline data were balanced and comparable. Compared with the control group, the weaning success rate of the observation group significantly increased [53.3% (24/45) vs. 31.2% (15/48), P = 0.031], endotracheal intubation rate significantly decreased [22.2% (10/45) vs. 43.8% (21/48), P = 0.028], mortality significantly reduced [20.0% (9/45) vs. 41.7% (20/48), P = 0.024], laboratory indicators WBC, PCT and CRP levels were significantly reduced [WBC (×109/L) 8.085±4.136 vs. 16.898±7.733, CRP (mg/L) 82.827±52.680 vs. 150.679±74.625, PCT (µg/L) 3.142±2.323 vs. 7.539±5.939, all P < 0.01]. CONCLUSIONS: Fluid negative balance and infection management have significant clinical significance in the treatment of severe novel coronavirus infection with ARDS.