Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Real-World Data Quality Framework for Oncology Time to Treatment Discontinuation Use Case: Implementation and Evaluation Study.
Ru, Boshu; Sillah, Arthur; Desai, Kaushal; Chandwani, Sheenu; Yao, Lixia; Kothari, Smita.
Afiliação
  • Ru B; Center for Observational and Real-world Evidence (CORE), Merck & Co, Inc, West Point, PA, United States.
  • Sillah A; Center for Observational and Real-world Evidence (CORE), Merck & Co, Inc, West Point, PA, United States.
  • Desai K; Center for Observational and Real-world Evidence (CORE), Merck & Co, Inc, West Point, PA, United States.
  • Chandwani S; Center for Observational and Real-world Evidence (CORE), Merck & Co, Inc, West Point, PA, United States.
  • Yao L; Center for Observational and Real-world Evidence (CORE), Merck & Co, Inc, West Point, PA, United States.
  • Kothari S; Center for Observational and Real-world Evidence (CORE), Merck & Co, Inc, West Point, PA, United States.
JMIR Med Inform ; 12: e47744, 2024 Mar 06.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38446504
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The importance of real-world evidence is widely recognized in observational oncology studies. However, the lack of interoperable data quality standards in the fragmented health information technology landscape represents an important challenge. Therefore, adopting validated systematic methods for evaluating data quality is important for oncology outcomes research leveraging real-world data (RWD).

OBJECTIVE:

This study aims to implement real-world time to treatment discontinuation (rwTTD) for a systemic anticancer therapy (SACT) as a new use case for the Use Case Specific Relevance and Quality Assessment, a framework linking data quality and relevance in fit-for-purpose RWD assessment.

METHODS:

To define the rwTTD use case, we mapped the operational definition of rwTTD to RWD elements commonly available from oncology electronic health record-derived data sets. We identified 20 tasks to check the completeness and plausibility of data elements concerning SACT use, line of therapy (LOT), death date, and length of follow-up. Using descriptive statistics, we illustrated how to implement the Use Case Specific Relevance and Quality Assessment on 2 oncology databases (Data sets A and B) to estimate the rwTTD of an SACT drug (target SACT) for patients with advanced head and neck cancer diagnosed on or after January 1, 2015.

RESULTS:

A total of 1200 (24.96%) of 4808 patients in Data set A and 237 (5.92%) of 4003 patients in Data set B received the target SACT, suggesting better relevance of the former in estimating the rwTTD of the target SACT. The 2 data sets differed with regard to the terminology used for SACT drugs, LOT format, and target SACT LOT distribution over time. Data set B appeared to have less complete SACT records, longer lags in incorporating the latest data, and incomplete mortality data, suggesting a lack of fitness for estimating rwTTD.

CONCLUSIONS:

The fit-for-purpose data quality assessment demonstrated substantial variability in the quality of the 2 real-world data sets. The data quality specifications applied for rwTTD estimation can be expanded to support a broad spectrum of oncology use cases.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article