Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Conformity of ChatGPT recommendations with the AUA/SUFU guideline on postprostatectomy urinary incontinence.
Pinto, Vicktor B P; de Azevedo, Matheus F; Wroclawski, Marcelo L; Gentile, Guilherme; Jesus, Vinicius L M; de Bessa Junior, Jose; Nahas, William C; Sacomani, Carlos A R; Sandhu, Jaspreet S; Gomes, Cristiano M.
Afiliação
  • Pinto VBP; Division of Urology, University of Sao Paulo School of Medicine, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
  • de Azevedo MF; Division of Urology, University of Sao Paulo School of Medicine, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
  • Wroclawski ML; Division of Urology, ABC Medical School, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
  • Gentile G; Department of Urology, Albert Einstein Jewish Hospital, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
  • Jesus VLM; Department of Urologic Oncology, BP-a Beneficência Portuguesa de São Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
  • de Bessa Junior J; Division of Urology, University of Sao Paulo School of Medicine, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
  • Nahas WC; Division of Urology, University of Sao Paulo School of Medicine, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
  • Sacomani CAR; Department of Surgery, State University of Feira de Santana, Bahia, Brazil.
  • Sandhu JS; Division of Urology, University of Sao Paulo School of Medicine, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
  • Gomes CM; Innovation and Information Technology Sector, AC Camargo Cancer Hospital, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Neurourol Urodyn ; 43(4): 935-941, 2024 Apr.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38451040
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Artificial intelligence (AI) shows immense potential in medicine and Chat generative pretrained transformer (ChatGPT) has been used for different purposes in the field. However, it may not match the complexity and nuance of certain medical scenarios. This study evaluates the accuracy of ChatGPT 3.5 and 4 in providing recommendations regarding the management of postprostatectomy urinary incontinence (PPUI), considering The Incontinence After Prostate Treatment AUA/SUFU Guideline as the best practice benchmark. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

A set of questions based on the AUA/SUFU Guideline was prepared. Queries included 10 conceptual questions and 10 case-based questions. All questions were open and entered into the ChatGPT with a recommendation to limit the answer to 200 words, for greater objectivity. Responses were graded as correct (1 point); partially correct (0.5 point), or incorrect (0 point). Performances of versions 3.5 and 4 of ChatGPT were analyzed overall and separately for the conceptual and the case-based questions.

RESULTS:

ChatGPT 3.5 scored 11.5 out of 20 points (57.5% accuracy), while ChatGPT 4 scored 18 (90.0%; p = 0.031). In the conceptual questions, ChatGPT 3.5 provided accurate answers to six questions along with one partially correct response and three incorrect answers, with a final score of 6.5. In contrast, ChatGPT 4 provided correct answers to eight questions and partially correct answers to two questions, scoring 9.0. In the case-based questions, ChatGPT 3.5 scored 5.0, while ChatGPT 4 scored 9.0. The domains where ChatGPT performed worst were evaluation, treatment options, surgical complications, and special situations.

CONCLUSION:

ChatGPT 4 demonstrated superior performance compared to ChatGPT 3.5 in providing recommendations for the management of PPUI, using the AUA/SUFU Guideline as a benchmark. Continuous monitoring is essential for evaluating the development and precision of AI-generated medical information.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Incontinência Urinária / Inteligência Artificial Limite: Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Incontinência Urinária / Inteligência Artificial Limite: Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article