Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
TARGET: A Randomized, Noninferiority Trial of a Pretest, Patient-Driven Genetic Education Webtool Versus Genetic Counseling for Prostate Cancer Germline Testing.
Loeb, Stacy; Keith, Scott W; Cheng, Heather H; Leader, Amy E; Gross, Laura; Sanchez Nolasco, Tatiana; Byrne, Nataliya; Hartman, Rebecca; Brown, Lauren H; Pieczonka, Christopher Michael; Gomella, Leonard G; Kelly, William Kevin; Lallas, Costas D; Handley, Nathan; Mille, Patrick Johnston; Mark, James Ryan; Brown, Gordon Andrew; Chopra, Sameer; McClellan, Alexandra; Wise, David R; Hollifield, Lucas; Giri, Veda N.
Afiliação
  • Loeb S; Department of Urology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY.
  • Keith SW; Department of Population Health, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY.
  • Cheng HH; Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY.
  • Leader AE; Department of Surgery/Urology, Manhattan Veterans Affairs, New York, NY.
  • Gross L; Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Department of Pharmacology, Physiology and Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA.
  • Sanchez Nolasco T; Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
  • Byrne N; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA.
  • Hartman R; Department of Medical Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA.
  • Brown LH; Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT.
  • Pieczonka CM; Yale New Haven Health, New Haven, CT.
  • Gomella LG; Department of Urology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY.
  • Kelly WK; Department of Population Health, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY.
  • Lallas CD; Department of Surgery/Urology, Manhattan Veterans Affairs, New York, NY.
  • Handley N; Department of Urology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY.
  • Mille PJ; Department of Population Health, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY.
  • Mark JR; Department of Surgery/Urology, Manhattan Veterans Affairs, New York, NY.
  • Brown GA; Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Department of Pharmacology, Physiology and Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA.
  • Chopra S; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA.
  • McClellan A; Associated Medical Professionals of NY, Syracuse, NY.
  • Wise DR; Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA.
  • Hollifield L; Department of Medical Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA.
  • Giri VN; Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA.
JCO Precis Oncol ; 8: e2300552, 2024 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38452310
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Germline genetic testing (GT) is important for prostate cancer (PCA) management, clinical trial eligibility, and hereditary cancer risk. However, GT is underutilized and there is a shortage of genetic counselors. To address these gaps, a patient-driven, pretest genetic education webtool was designed and studied compared with traditional genetic counseling (GC) to inform strategies for expanding access to genetic services.

METHODS:

Technology-enhanced acceleration of germline evaluation for therapy (TARGET) was a multicenter, noninferiority, randomized trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT04447703) comparing a nine-module patient-driven genetic education webtool versus pretest GC. Participants completed surveys measuring decisional conflict, satisfaction, and attitudes toward GT at baseline, after pretest education/counseling, and after GT result disclosure. The primary end point was noninferiority in reducing decisional conflict between webtool and GC using the validated Decisional Conflict Scale. Mixed-effects regression modeling was used to compare decisional conflict between groups. Participants opting for GT received a 51-gene panel, with results delivered to participants and their providers.

RESULTS:

The analytic data set includes primary outcome data from 315 participants (GC [n = 162] and webtool [n = 153]). Mean difference in decisional conflict score changes between groups was -0.04 (one-sided 95% CI, -∞ to 2.54; P = .01), suggesting the patient-driven webtool was noninferior to GC. Overall, 145 (89.5%) GC and 120 (78.4%) in the webtool arm underwent GT, with pathogenic variants in 15.8% (8.7% in PCA genes). Satisfaction did not differ significantly between arms; knowledge of cancer genetics was higher but attitudes toward GT were less favorable in the webtool arm.

CONCLUSION:

The results of the TARGET study support the use of patient-driven digital webtools for expanding access to pretest genetic education for PCA GT. Further studies to optimize patient experience and evaluate them in diverse patient populations are warranted.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Próstata / Aconselhamento Genético Limite: Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Próstata / Aconselhamento Genético Limite: Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article