Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Deep-learning reconstructed lumbar spine 3D MRI for surgical planning: pedicle screw placement and geometric measurements compared to CT.
Abel, Frederik; Lebl, Darren R; Gorgy, George; Dalton, David; Chazen, J Levi; Lim, Elisha; Li, Qian; Sneag, Darryl B; Tan, Ek T.
Afiliação
  • Abel F; Department of Radiology and Imaging, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E 70th Street, New York, NY, 10021, USA. frederikabel@gmx.net.
  • Lebl DR; Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E 70th Street, New York, NY, 10021, USA. frederikabel@gmx.net.
  • Gorgy G; Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E 70th Street, New York, NY, 10021, USA.
  • Dalton D; Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E 70th Street, New York, NY, 10021, USA.
  • Chazen JL; Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E 70th Street, New York, NY, 10021, USA.
  • Lim E; Department of Radiology and Imaging, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E 70th Street, New York, NY, 10021, USA.
  • Li Q; Department of Radiology and Imaging, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E 70th Street, New York, NY, 10021, USA.
  • Sneag DB; Biostatistics Core, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E 70th Street, New York, NY, 10021, USA.
  • Tan ET; Department of Radiology and Imaging, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E 70th Street, New York, NY, 10021, USA.
Eur Spine J ; 2024 Mar 12.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38472429
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To test equivalency of deep-learning 3D lumbar spine MRI with "CT-like" contrast to CT for virtual pedicle screw planning and geometric measurements in robotic-navigated spinal surgery.

METHODS:

Between December 2021 and June 2022, 16 patients referred for spinal fusion and decompression surgery with pre-operative CT and 3D MRI were retrospectively assessed. Pedicle screws were virtually placed on lumbar (L1-L5) and sacral (S1) vertebrae by three spine surgeons, and metrics (lateral deviation, axial/sagittal angles) were collected. Vertebral body length/width (VL/VW) and pedicle height/width (PH/PW) were measured at L1-L5 by three radiologists. Analysis included equivalency testing using the 95% confidence interval (CI), a margin of ± 1 mm (± 2.08° for angles), and intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs).

RESULTS:

Across all vertebral levels, both combined and separately, equivalency between CT and MRI was proven for all pedicle screw metrics and geometric measurements, except for VL at L1 (mean difference - 0.64 mm; [95%CI - 1.05, - 0.24]), L2 (- 0.65 mm; [95%CI - 1.11, - 0.20]), and L4 (- 0.78 mm; [95%CI - 1.11, - 0.46]). Inter- and intra-rater ICC for screw metrics across all vertebral levels combined ranged from 0.68 to 0.91 and 0.89-0.98 for CT, and from 0.62 to 0.92 and 0.81-0.97 for MRI, respectively. Inter- and intra-rater ICC for geometric measurements ranged from 0.60 to 0.95 and 0.84-0.97 for CT, and 0.61-0.95 and 0.93-0.98 for MRI, respectively.

CONCLUSION:

Deep-learning 3D MRI facilitates equivalent virtual pedicle screw placements and geometric assessments for most lumbar vertebrae, with the exception of vertebral body length at L1, L2, and L4, compared to CT for pre-operative planning in patients considered for robotic-navigated spine surgery.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article