Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Reliability and Accuracy of the Outerbridge Classification in Staging of Cartilage Defects.
Mederake, Moritz; Scheibe, Vivien; Dalheimer, Philipp; Schüll, Daniel; Marina, Danalache; Hofmann, Ulf Krister.
Afiliação
  • Mederake M; Department of Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, BG Klinik, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
  • Scheibe V; Medical Faculty of the University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
  • Dalheimer P; Laboratory of Cell Biology, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospital of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
  • Schüll D; Department Orthopedic Surgery, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
  • Marina D; Orthopaedic Practice Nagold-Riedt, Chan, Dalheimer, Nagold, Germany.
  • Hofmann UK; Department of Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, BG Klinik, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Orthop Surg ; 16(5): 1187-1195, 2024 May.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38488230
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

The decision on whether or not and how to treat a local cartilage defect is still made intraoperatively based on the visual presentation of the cartilage and findings from indentations with an arthroscopic probe. The treatment decision is then usually based on grading according to established classifications systems, which, therefore, need to have high reliability and accuracy. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the reliability and accuracy of the Outerbridge classification in staging cartilage defects.

METHODS:

We performed an observer arthroscopic study using the Outerbridge classification on seven fresh-frozen human cadaveric knees, which collectively exhibited nine cartilage defects. To evaluate accuracy, defect severity was verified through histological examination. Interrater and intrarater reliabilites were calculated using Cohen's kappa and the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC 3.1).

RESULTS:

The interrater and intrarater reliability for the Outerbridge classification ranged from poor to substantial, with 0.24 ≤ κ ≤ 0.70 and κ = 0.55 to κ = 0.66, respectively. The accuracy evaluated by comparison with the histological examination was 63% overall. The erroneous evaluations were, however, still often at the discrimination of grade 2 and 3. We did not find any relationship between higher experience and accuracy or intraobserver reliability. Taken together, these results encourage surgeons to further use diagnostic arthroscopy for evaluating cartilage lesions. Nevertheless, especially in grade 2 and 3, deviations from the histology were observed. This is, however, the point where a decision is made on whether to surgically address the defect or not.

CONCLUSION:

Diagnostic arthroscopy is the standard for cartilage lesion assessment, yet interobserver reliability is fair to substantial. Caution is warranted in interpreting varied observer results. The accuracy of the "simpler" Outerbridge classification is insufficient compared to histological examinations, highlighting the need for improved techniques in guideline-based intraoperative decision-making.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Artroscopia / Cadáver / Cartilagem Articular / Variações Dependentes do Observador Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Artroscopia / Cadáver / Cartilagem Articular / Variações Dependentes do Observador Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article