Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Patients' preferences for secondary prevention following a coronary event.
van Trier, Tinka J; Jørstad, Harald T; Scholte Op Reimer, Wilma J M; Sunamura, Madoka; Ter Hoeve, Nienke; Aernout Somsen, G; Peters, Ron J G; Snaterse, Marjolein.
Afiliação
  • van Trier TJ; Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Jørstad HT; Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Scholte Op Reimer WJM; Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Sunamura M; Research Group Chronic Diseases, HU University of Applied Sciences Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Ter Hoeve N; Capri Cardiac Rehabilitation Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Aernout Somsen G; Franciscus Gasthuis & Vlietland Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Peters RJG; Capri Cardiac Rehabilitation Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Snaterse M; Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Erasmus MC Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Prev Med Rep ; 40: 102681, 2024 Apr.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38495768
ABSTRACT

Objective:

Despite clear evidence on the effectiveness of secondary prevention, patients with coronary artery disease frequently fail to reach guideline-based risk factor targets. Integrating patients' preferences into treatment decisions has been recommended to reduce this gap. However, this requires knowledge about patient treatment preferences. Therefore, through a survey study, we aimed to explore which risk factors patients self-perceived, prioritised for improvement, and needed support with after a recent hospitalisation for coronary heart disease.

Methods:

A digital questionnaire was presented to patients > 18 years recently discharged (≤3 months) from an acute coronary care unit in the Netherlands (Europe). Patients could select from eight cardiovascular risk factors that they (1) self-perceived, (2) prioritised for improvement, and (3) needed support to improve. Patients' perceived risk factors were compared to those documented in the medical records.

Results:

Respondents (N = 254, 26 % women), mean age 64 (SD 10) years, identified 'physical inactivity' more frequently than their medical records (140 patients vs. 91 records, p < 0.001), while three other risk factors were reported with equal and four with lower frequency. 'Physical inactivity', 'overweight' and 'stress' were most frequently prioritised for improvement (82 %, 88 % and 78 %) and professional support (64 %, 50 % and 58 %), with 87 % preferring lifestyle optimisation if this would reduce drug use.

Conclusions:

Patients with a recent coronary event show significant disparities in identifying risk factors compared to their medical records. They tend to prefer improving lifestyle- over drug-modifiable risk factors, particularly physical inactivity, overweight and stress, and indicate the need for support in improving these factors.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article