Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Time in Range Analysis in Automated Insulin Delivery Era: Should Day and Nighttime Targets be the Same?
Maia, Ariana; Subias Andujar, David; Yuste, Cristina; Albert, Lara; Vilaverde, Joana; Cardoso, Maria Helena; Rigla, Mercedes.
Afiliação
  • Maia A; Serviço de Endocrinologia, Diabetes e Metabolismo, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Santo António, Porto, Portugal.
  • Subias Andujar D; Endocrinology Department, Parc Taulí Hospital Universitari, Sabadell, Spain.
  • Yuste C; Institut d'Investigació i Innovació Parc Taulí, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Sabadell, Spain.
  • Albert L; Endocrinology Department, Parc Taulí Hospital Universitari, Sabadell, Spain.
  • Vilaverde J; Institut d'Investigació i Innovació Parc Taulí, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Sabadell, Spain.
  • Cardoso MH; Endocrinology Department, Parc Taulí Hospital Universitari, Sabadell, Spain.
  • Rigla M; Institut d'Investigació i Innovació Parc Taulí, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Sabadell, Spain.
J Diabetes Sci Technol ; : 19322968241236456, 2024 Mar 19.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38501504
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Hybrid closed-loop systems (HCLS) use has shown that time in range (TIR) tends to improve more during the nighttime than during the day. This study aims to compare the conventional TIR, currently accepted as 70 to 180 mg/dL, with a proposed recalculated time in range (RTIR) considering a tighter glucose target of 70 to 140 mg/dL for the nighttime fasting period in T1DM patients under HCLS.

METHODS:

We conducted a retrospective study that included adults patients receiving treatment with Tandem tslim X2 Control-IQ. Daytime TIR was characterized as glucose values between 70 and 180 mg/dL during the 0701 to 2359 time frame. Nighttime fasting TIR was specified as glucose values from 70 to 140 mg/dL between 0000 and 0700. The combination of the daytime and nighttime fasting glucose targets results in an RTIR, which was compared with the conventional TIR for each patient. The 14 days Dexcom G6 CGM data were downloaded from Tidepool platform and analyzed.

RESULTS:

We included 22 patients with a mean age of 49.7 years and diabetes duration of 24.7 years, who had been using automatic insulin delivery (AID) HCLS for a median of 305.3 days. We verified a mean conventional TIR of 68.7% vs a mean RTIR of 60.3%, with a mean percentage difference between these two metrics of -8.4%. A significant decrease in conventional TIR was verified when tighter glucose targets were considered during the nighttime period. No significant correlation was found between the percentage difference values and RTIR, even among the group of patients with the lowest conventional TIR.

CONCLUSIONS:

Currently, meeting the conventional TIR metrics may fall short of achieving an ideal level of glycemic control. An individualized strategy should be adopted until further data become available for a precise definition of optimal glucose targets.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article