Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Implementing Approach-Bias Modification as Add-On to Varieties of Clinical Treatment for Alcohol Use Disorders: Results of a Multicenter RCT.
Schenkel, Edwin J; Rinck, Mike; Wiers, Reinout W; Becker, Eni S; Muhlig, Stephan; Schoeneck, Robert; Lindenmeyer, Johannes.
Afiliação
  • Schenkel EJ; Department of Psychology, Medizinische Hochschule Brandenburg Theodor Fontane, Neuruppin, Germany.
  • Rinck M; Salus Clinic Lindow, Lindow, Germany.
  • Wiers RW; Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  • Becker ES; Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  • Muhlig S; Department of Psychology, Addiction Development and Psychopathology (ADAPT) Lab, ABC and Yield Research Priority Areas, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Schoeneck R; Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  • Lindenmeyer J; Department of Psychology, Chemnitz University of Technology, Chemnitz, Germany.
Eur Addict Res ; 30(2): 94-102, 2024.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38503273
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Abstinence rates after inpatient treatment for alcohol use disorder (AUD) are modest (1-year rate around 50%). One promising approach is to re-train the automatically activated action tendency to approach alcohol-related stimuli (alcohol-approach bias) in AUD patients, as add-on to regular treatment. As efficacy has been demonstrated in well-controlled randomized controlled trials, the important next step is to add alcohol-approach-bias modification (alcohol-ApBM) to varieties of existing treatments for AUD. Therefore, this prospective, multicenter implementation-RCT examined whether adding alcohol-ApBM to regular treatments (various abstinence-oriented treatments including both individual and group-based interventions) would significantly increase abstinence rates compared to receiving regular treatment only, in a variety of naturalistic settings with different therapeutic approaches.

METHODS:

A total of 1,586 AUD inpatients from 9 German rehabilitation clinics were randomly assigned to receive either ApBM in addition to regular treatment or not. Training satisfaction of patients and therapists was measured after training. Success rates were determined at 3, 6, and 12 months post-treatment.

RESULTS:

Return rates of the post-treatment assessments varied greatly between clinics, often being low (18-76%). Nevertheless, ApBM significantly increased success rates after 3 months. After 6 and 12 months, the differences were not significant. ApBM was evaluated mostly positively by patients and therapists. DISCUSSION/

CONCLUSION:

ApBM was an effective add-on to regular treatment of AUD at 3 months follow-up, across a variety of AUD treatment settings. However, low return rates for the clinical outcomes reduced the effect size of ApBM considerably. The application of ApBM proved feasible in varying clinical settings, offering the opportunity to modify automatic processes and to promote abstinence.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Terapia Cognitivo-Comportamental / Alcoolismo Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Terapia Cognitivo-Comportamental / Alcoolismo Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article