Red blood cell transfusion in neurocritical patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Anemia can lead to secondary brain damage by reducing arterial oxygen content and brain oxygen supply. Patients with acute brain injury have impaired self-regulation. Brain hypoxia may also occur even in mild anemia. Red blood cell (RBC) transfusion is associated with increased postoperative complications, poor neurological recovery, and mortality in critically ill neurologic patients. Balancing the risks of anemia and red blood cell transfusion-associated adverse effects is challenging in neurocritical settings. METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Embase, and MEDLINE (PubMed) from inception to January 31, 2024. We included all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing liberal versus restrictive RBC transfusion strategies in neurocritical patients. We included all relevant studies published in English. The primary outcome was mortality at intensive care unit (ICU), discharge, and six months. RESULTS: Of 5195 records retrieved, 84 full-text articles were reviewed, and five eligible studies were included. There was no significant difference between the restrictive and liberal transfusion groups in ICU mortality (RR 2.53, 95% CI 0.53 to 12.13), in-hospital mortality (RR 2.34, 95% CI 0.50 to 11.00), mortality at six months (RR 1.42, 95% CI 0.42 to 4.78) and long-term mortality (RR 1.22, 95% CI 0.64 to 2.33). The occurrence of neurological adverse events and most major non-neurological complications was similar in the two groups. The incidence of deep venous thrombosis was lower in the restrictive strategy group (RR 0.41, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.91). CONCLUSIONS: Due to the small sample size of current studies, the evidence is insufficiently robust to confirm definitive conclusions for neurocritical patients. Therefore, further investigation is encouraged to define appropriate RBC transfusion thresholds in the neurocritical setting.