Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Extended offset stems are infrequently required in anterior approach total hip arthroplasty and low usage does not compromise stability.
Weldon, Edward; Agonias, Keinan; DeJesus, James; Weldon, Rosana Hernandez; Au, Donna Lyn M T; Nakasone, Cass K.
Afiliação
  • Weldon E; John A Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawaii at Manoa, 651 Ilalo Street, Honolulu, HI, 96813, USA.
  • Agonias K; John A Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawaii at Manoa, 651 Ilalo Street, Honolulu, HI, 96813, USA.
  • DeJesus J; John A Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawaii at Manoa, 651 Ilalo Street, Honolulu, HI, 96813, USA.
  • Weldon RH; University of Hawaii at Manoa, Office of Public Health Studies, 1960 East-West Road, Honolulu, HI, 96822, USA.
  • Au DLMT; Straub Medical Center, Bone and Joint Center, 888 South King Street, Honolulu, HI, 96813, USA.
  • Nakasone CK; John A Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawaii at Manoa, 651 Ilalo Street, Honolulu, HI, 96813, USA. onohunter@icloud.com.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg ; 144(5): 2365-2372, 2024 May.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38512461
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Extended offset (EO) stems are commonly used in posterior approach (PA) total hip arthroplasty (THA), but usage rates and complications are not well studied with anterior approach (AA) THA. This study evaluated usage rates, radiographic outcomes and complications following AA THA between patients receiving EO stems and a matched cohort receiving standard offset (SO) stems. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

This retrospective review evaluated 1515 consecutive AA THA performed between 2014 and 2021. The recent 100 EO were included in radiographic and complication analysis and were matched to 100 SO stems based on stem size, procedure (unilateral/bilateral), sex, body mass index (BMI), and age. Data collection included patient demographics; pre- and postoperative radiographic measurements of leg length difference (LLD) and global hip offset difference (GHOD); and complications within 1 year. Independent t-tests and Chi-squared analyses compared EO and SO groups.

RESULTS:

EO was utilized in 8% of all AA THA. Despite matching procedures, the distribution of racial groups was different between EO and SO groups, respectively Caucasian (75% vs. 43%), Asian (12% vs. 35%), Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander (NHPI) (9% vs. 13%), and other (4% vs. 9%) (p < 0.001). No fractures, dislocations, or revisions occurred within 1 year after surgery in either group. One deep infection was noted in the SO group. The proportions of patients following surgery who had a GHOD < 6 mm (76% vs. 82%; p = 0.193) and LLD < 6 mm (81% vs. 86%; p = 0.223) were not significantly different between EO and SO groups, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS:

Prioritizing hip symmetry over stability results in a high proportion of patients achieving hip symmetry without high usage of EO stems in AA THA. Furthermore, low use of EO stems did not result in increased dislocations. Due to racial anatomical differences, Caucasian patients required EO stems to achieve hip symmetry more frequently than Asian and NHPI patients.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Artroplastia de Quadril / Prótese de Quadril Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Artroplastia de Quadril / Prótese de Quadril Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article