Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Biomechanical comparison of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction fixation methods and implications on clinical outcomes.
McDermott, Emily; DeFoor, Mikalyn T; Blaber, Olivia K; Aman, Zachary S; DePhillipo, Nicholas N; Dekker, Travis J.
Afiliação
  • McDermott E; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, San Antonio Military Medical Center, San Antonio, TX, USA.
  • DeFoor MT; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, San Antonio Military Medical Center, San Antonio, TX, USA.
  • Blaber OK; Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Aman ZS; Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • DePhillipo NN; University of Pennsylvania, Department of Orthopedics, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Dekker TJ; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, 10th Medical Group, US Air Force Academy, CO, USA.
Ann Jt ; 8: 15, 2023.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38529220
ABSTRACT
Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is one of the more common surgeries encountered by orthopaedic surgeons, which has its inherent challenges due to the complex anatomy and biomechanical properties required to reproduce the function and stability of the native ACL. Multiple biomechanical factors from graft choice and tunnel placement to graft tensioning and fixation methods are vital in achieving a successful clinical outcome. Common methods of ACLR graft fixation in both the primary and revision setting are classified into compression/interference, suspensory, or hybrid fixation strategies with multiple adjunct methods of fixation. The individual biomechanical properties of these implants are crucial in facilitating early post-operative rehabilitation, while also withstanding the shear and tensile forces to avoid displacement and early graft failure during graft osseointegration. Implants within these categories include the use of interference screws (IFSs), as well as suspensory fixation with a button, posts, surgical staples, or suture anchors. Outcomes of comparative studies across the various fixation types demonstrate that compression fixation can decrease graft-tunnel motion, tunnel widening, and graft creep, at the risk of damage to the graft by IFSs and graft slippage. Suspensory fixation allows for a minimally invasive approach while allowing similar cortical apposition and biomechanical strength when compared to compression fixation. However, suspensory fixation is criticized for the risk of tunnel widening and increased graft-tunnel motion. Several adjunct fixation methods, including the use of posts, suture-anchors, and staples, offer biomechanical advantages over compression or suspensory fixation methods alone, through a second form of fixation in a second plane of motion. Regardless of the method or implant chosen for fixation, technically secure fixation is paramount to avoid displacement of the graft and allow for appropriate integration of the graft into the bone tunnel. While no single fixation technique has been established as the gold standard, a thorough understanding of the biomechanical advantages and disadvantages of each fixation method can be used to determine the optimal ACLR fixation method through an individualized patient approach.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article