Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Optimising machine learning prediction of minimum inhibitory concentrations in Klebsiella pneumoniae.
Batisti Biffignandi, Gherard; Chindelevitch, Leonid; Corbella, Marta; Feil, Edward J; Sassera, Davide; Lees, John A.
Afiliação
  • Batisti Biffignandi G; Department of Biology and Biotechnology, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
  • Chindelevitch L; MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Imperial College, London, England, UK.
  • Corbella M; European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, UK.
  • Feil EJ; MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Imperial College, London, England, UK.
  • Sassera D; Microbiology and Virology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy.
  • Lees JA; The Milner Centre for Evolution, Department of Life Sciences, University of Bath, Bath, UK.
Microb Genom ; 10(3)2024 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38529944
ABSTRACT
Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations (MICs) are the gold standard for quantitatively measuring antibiotic resistance. However, lab-based MIC determination can be time-consuming and suffers from low reproducibility, and interpretation as sensitive or resistant relies on guidelines which change over time. Genome sequencing and machine learning promise to allow in silico MIC prediction as an alternative approach which overcomes some of these difficulties, albeit the interpretation of MIC is still needed. Nevertheless, precisely how we should handle MIC data when dealing with predictive models remains unclear, since they are measured semi-quantitatively, with varying resolution, and are typically also left- and right-censored within varying ranges. We therefore investigated genome-based prediction of MICs in the pathogen Klebsiella pneumoniae using 4367 genomes with both simulated semi-quantitative traits and real MICs. As we were focused on clinical interpretation, we used interpretable rather than black-box machine learning models, namely, Elastic Net, Random Forests, and linear mixed models. Simulated traits were generated accounting for oligogenic, polygenic, and homoplastic genetic effects with different levels of heritability. Then we assessed how model prediction accuracy was affected when MICs were framed as regression and classification. Our results showed that treating the MICs differently depending on the number of concentration levels of antibiotic available was the most promising learning strategy. Specifically, to optimise both prediction accuracy and inference of the correct causal variants, we recommend considering the MICs as continuous and framing the learning problem as a regression when the number of observed antibiotic concentration levels is large, whereas with a smaller number of concentration levels they should be treated as a categorical variable and the learning problem should be framed as a classification. Our findings also underline how predictive models can be improved when prior biological knowledge is taken into account, due to the varying genetic architecture of each antibiotic resistance trait. Finally, we emphasise that incrementing the population database is pivotal for the future clinical implementation of these models to support routine machine-learning based diagnostics.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Klebsiella pneumoniae / Antibacterianos Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Klebsiella pneumoniae / Antibacterianos Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article