Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Oral Antibiotics Alone versus Oral Antibiotics Combined with Mechanical Bowel Preparation for Elective Colorectal Surgery: A Propensity Score-Matching Re-Analysis of the iCral 2 and 3 Prospective Cohorts.
Catarci, Marco; Guadagni, Stefano; Masedu, Francesco; Sartelli, Massimo; Montemurro, Leonardo Antonio; Baiocchi, Gian Luca; Tebala, Giovanni Domenico; Borghi, Felice; Marini, Pierluigi; Scatizzi, Marco.
Afiliação
  • Catarci M; General Surgery Unit, Sandro Pertini Hospital, ASL Roma 2, 00157 Roma, Italy.
  • Guadagni S; General Surgery Unit, University of L'Aquila, 67100 L'Aquila, Italy.
  • Masedu F; Department of Applied Clinical Sciences and Biotechnology, University of L'Aquila, 67100 L'Aquila, Italy.
  • Sartelli M; General Surgery Unit, Santa Lucia Hospital, 62100 Macerata, Italy.
  • Montemurro LA; General Surgery Unit, Sandro Pertini Hospital, ASL Roma 2, 00157 Roma, Italy.
  • Baiocchi GL; General Surgical Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia at the Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale (ASST), 26100 Cremona, Italy.
  • Tebala GD; Digestive & Emergency Surgery Unit, Santa Maria Hospital, 05100 Terni, Italy.
  • Borghi F; Oncologic Surgery Unit, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, 10060 Candiolo, Italy.
  • Marini P; General & Emergency Surgery Unit, San Camillo-Forlanini Hospital, 00152 Roma, Italy.
  • Scatizzi M; General Surgery Unit, Santa Maria Annunziata & Serristori Hospital, 50012 Firenze, Italy.
Antibiotics (Basel) ; 13(3)2024 Mar 03.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38534670
ABSTRACT
The evidence regarding the role of oral antibiotics alone (oA) or combined with mechanical bowel preparation (MoABP) for elective colorectal surgery remains controversial. A prospective database of 8359 colorectal resections gathered over a 32-month period from 78 Italian surgical units (the iCral 2 and 3 studies), reporting patient-, disease-, and procedure-related variables together with 60-day adverse events, was re-analyzed to identify a subgroup of 1013 cases (12.1%) that received either oA or MoABP. This dataset was analyzed using a 11 propensity score-matching model including 20 covariates. Two well-balanced groups of 243 patients each were obtained group A (oA) and group B (MoABP). The primary endpoints were anastomotic leakage (AL) and surgical site infection (SSI) rates. Group A vs. group B showed a significantly higher AL risk [14 (5.8%) vs. 6 (2.5%) events; OR 3.77; 95%CI 1.22-11.67; p = 0.021], while no significant difference was recorded between the two groups regarding SSIs. These results strongly support the use of MoABP for elective colorectal resections.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article