Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Performance evaluation of deep learning based stream nitrate concentration prediction model to fill stream nitrate data gaps at low-frequency nitrate monitoring basins.
Saha, Gourab; Shen, Chaopeng; Duncan, Jonathan; Cibin, Raj.
Afiliação
  • Saha G; Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, United States.
  • Shen C; Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, United States.
  • Duncan J; Department of Ecosystem Science and Management, The Pennsylvania State University, United States.
  • Cibin R; Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, United States; Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, United States. Electronic address: craj@psu.edu.
J Environ Manage ; 357: 120721, 2024 Apr.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38565027
ABSTRACT
Accurate and frequent nitrate estimates can provide valuable information on the nitrate transport dynamics. The study aimed to develop a data-driven modeling framework to estimate daily nitrate concentrations at low-frequency nitrate monitoring sites using the daily nitrate concentration and stream discharge information of a neighboring high-frequency nitrate monitoring site. A Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) based deep learning (DL) modeling framework was developed to predict daily nitrate concentrations. The DL modeling framework performance was compared with two well-established statistical models, including LOADEST and WRTDS-Kalman, in three selected basins in Iowa, USA Des Moines, Iowa, and Cedar River. The developed DL model performed well with NSE >0.70 and KGE >0.70 for 67% and 79% nitrate monitoring sites, respectively. DL and WRTDS-Kalman models performed better than the LOADEST in nitrate concentration and load estimation for all low-frequency sites. The average NSE performance of the DL model in daily nitrate estimation is 20% higher than that of the WRTDS-Kalman model at 18 out of 24 sites (75%). The WRTDS-Kalman model showed unrealistic fluctuations in the estimated daily nitrate time series when the model received limited observed nitrate data (less than 50) for simulation. The DL model indicated superior performance in winter months' nitrate prediction (60% of cases) compared to WRTDS-Kalman models (33% of cases). The DL model also better represented the exceedance days from the USEPA maximum contamination level (MCL). Both the DL and WRTDS-Kalman models demonstrated similar performance in annual stream nitrate load estimation, and estimated values are close to actual nitrate loads.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Aprendizado Profundo / Nitratos Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Aprendizado Profundo / Nitratos Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article