Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Validation of Long-term Recall of Pregnancy-related Weight in the Life-course Experiences And Pregnancy Study.
Farkas, Kriszta; Bodnar, Lisa M; Emery Tavernier, Rebecca L; Friedman, Jessica K; Johnson, Sydney T; MacLehose, Richard F; Mason, Susan M.
Afiliação
  • Farkas K; From the Division of Epidemiology & Community Health, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis, MN.
  • Bodnar LM; Department of Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, PA.
  • Emery Tavernier RL; Weitzman Institute, Moses Weitzman Health System, Middletown, CT.
  • Friedman JK; Department of Family Medicine and Biobehavioral Health, University of Minnesota Medical School, Duluth Campus, Duluth, MN.
  • Johnson ST; Center for Care Delivery and Outcomes Research, Minneapolis Veterans Administration Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN.
  • MacLehose RF; VA HSR&D Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation and Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Health Care System, Los Angeles, CA.
  • Mason SM; From the Division of Epidemiology & Community Health, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis, MN.
Epidemiology ; 35(4): 489-498, 2024 Jul 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38567930
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Prepregnancy body mass index (BMI) and gestational weight gain (GWG) are determinants of maternal and child health. However, many studies of these factors rely on error-prone self-reported measures.

METHODS:

Using data from Life-course Experiences And Pregnancy (LEAP), a US-based cohort, we assessed the validity of prepregnancy BMI and GWG recalled on average 8 years postpartum against medical record data treated as alloyed gold standard ("true") values. We calculated probabilities of being classified into a self-reported prepregnancy BMI or GWG category conditional on one's true category (analogous to sensitivities and specificities) and probabilities of truly being in each prepregnancy BMI or GWG category conditional on one's self-reported category (analogous to positive and negative predictive values).

RESULTS:

There was a tendency toward under-reporting prepregnancy BMI. Self-report misclassified 32% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 19%, 48%) of those in LEAP with truly overweight and 13% (5%, 27%) with obesity into a lower BMI category. Self-report correctly predicted the truth for 72% (55%, 84%) with self-reported overweight to 100% (90%, 100%) with self-reported obesity. For GWG, both under- and over-reporting were common; self-report misclassified 32% (15%, 55%) with truly low GWG as having moderate GWG and 50% (28%, 72%) with truly high GWG as moderate or low GWG. Self-report correctly predicted the truth for 45% (25%, 67%) with self-reported high GWG to 85% (76%, 91%) with self-reported moderate GWG. Misclassification of BMI and GWG varied across maternal characteristics.

CONCLUSION:

Findings can be used in quantitative bias analyses to estimate bias-adjusted associations with prepregnancy BMI and GWG.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Rememoração Mental / Índice de Massa Corporal / Autorrelato / Ganho de Peso na Gestação Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Pregnancy País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Rememoração Mental / Índice de Massa Corporal / Autorrelato / Ganho de Peso na Gestação Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Pregnancy País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article