Comparison of closed percutaneous screw reduction versus open reduction and internal fixation in the treatment of frontal sinus fractures: A retrospective study.

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to compare closed percutaneous screw reduction to traditional open reduction-internal fixation (OR-IF) for the treatment of anterior table fractures. Both groups were evaluated in terms of operative variables, complications, and treatment success. Of 32 patients included, 19 patients underwent OR-IF, while 13 underwent percutaneous screw reduction. The median operative time, length of hospital stays, and treatment cost of the OR-IF group were 100 min (range 60-130), 4 days (range 3-9), and $727 (range $642-$1291), respectively. The same variables for the closed reduction group were 30 min (range 20-40), 2 days (range 1-2), and $303 (range $252-$349), respectively. The closed reduction group exhibited a shorter operative time (p< 0.001), reduced length of hospital stays (p< 0.001), lower treatment cost (p< 0.001), and a lower complication rate (p = 0.025) compared to the OR-IF group. Late-term outcomes in both groups showed no visible contour changes or step deformities. In conclusion, the percutaneous screw reduction technique is a safe and effective option with minimal morbidity in the treatment of frontal sinus anterior table fractures. Therefore, traditional OR-IF should be reserved for fractures that are not suitable for reduction using minimally invasive techniques.