Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Incidence of nausea/vomiting following propofol sedation with adaptive servo-ventilation for atrial fibrillation ablation.
Sakanoue, Haruna; Yamaji, Hirosuke; Okamoto, Sayaka; Okano, Kumi; Fujita, Yuka; Higashiya, Shunichi; Murakami, Takashi; Kusachi, Shozo.
Afiliação
  • Sakanoue H; Department of Nursing Okayama Heart Clinic Okayama Japan.
  • Yamaji H; Heart Rhythm Center Okayama Heart Clinic Okayama Japan.
  • Okamoto S; Department of Nursing Okayama Heart Clinic Okayama Japan.
  • Okano K; Department of Nursing Okayama Heart Clinic Okayama Japan.
  • Fujita Y; Department of Nursing Okayama Heart Clinic Okayama Japan.
  • Higashiya S; Heart Rhythm Center Okayama Heart Clinic Okayama Japan.
  • Murakami T; Heart Rhythm Center Okayama Heart Clinic Okayama Japan.
  • Kusachi S; Heart Rhythm Center Okayama Heart Clinic Okayama Japan.
J Arrhythm ; 40(2): 289-296, 2024 Apr.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38586848
ABSTRACT

Background:

Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) following atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation can cause considerable distress.

Aim:

Continuous intravenous propofol sedation with adaptive servo-ventilation (ASV) with or without an analgesic, pentazocine, during AF ablation was studied in 272 consecutive patients with paroxysmal, persistent, and long-standing persistent AF. The study objectives were to determine the incidence of PONV after AF ablation and to assess the predictive value of factors for PONV using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).

Results:

The present sedation maneuver was successfully accomplished with a low incidence of hypotension and without discontinuation of ablation or switching to general anesthesia, while maintaining an acceptable procedural time (102 ± 32 min). The incidence of PONV was 5.5% (15/272). Nausea occurred in nine patients after an average of 4.6 ± 3.5 h (range 2-12 h) postablation, and vomiting with nausea occurred in six patients after an average of 4.5 ± 3.1 h (range 1-9 h) postablation. The postablation interval did not differ significantly between the occurrence of nausea and nausea accompanied by vomiting. AUCs based on various factors, including the Apfel score, ranged from 0.55 to 0.67, indicating low accuracy in predicting PONV occurrence.

Conclusions:

The incidence of PONV after propofol sedation with ASV was the lowest (5.5%) reported to date. Scoring systems, which included the Apfel score, were ineffective in predicting PONV. The low PONV incidence in addition to the efficacy of propofol sedation with ASV revealed the adequacy of this regimen for AF ablation.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article