Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Survival outcomes and toxicity profiles among patients with nonmetastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) versus IMRT + carbon-ion radiotherapy: A propensity score-matched analysis.
Li, Yujiao; Guan, Xiyin; Xing, Xing; Hu, Chaosu.
Afiliação
  • Li Y; Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Fudan University Cancer Hospital, Shanghai, China.
  • Guan X; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology (20dz2261000), Shanghai, China.
  • Xing X; Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Proton and Heavy Ion Radiation Therapy, Shanghai, China.
  • Hu C; Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Head Neck ; 46(7): 1766-1776, 2024 07.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38591178
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

To compare survival outcomes and toxic effects among patients with newly diagnosed nonmetastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) when treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) versus IMRT + carbon-ion radiotherapy (CIRT).

METHODS:

We performed a retrospective propensity score matching analysis (11) of patients treated with IMRT and IMRT + CIRT. Descriptive statistics were used to examine the baseline characteristics of the patients. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analysis were used to identify the independent predictors of survival. We examined the association between risk factors and adverse events (AEs) using chi-square tests. Cox model and logistic regression were used to analyze AEs.

RESULTS:

Hundred and nine patients who received IMRT + CIRT were included and the median follow-up time was 20.6 months (range 4.6-82 months). There were no statistically significant differences in locoregional failure-free survival, distant metastasis-free survival, disease-free survival, or overall survival between the two groups, but potentially better in IMRT + CIRT group (p > 0.05, respectively). Nodal boost was the only significant factor associated with LRFS and DFS on multivariable analysis. Thirty-seven patients (34.0%) developed grade 3 acute OMs and no grade 4 acute OMs were observed in IMRT + CIRT group. All patients in IMRT + CIRT group developed grade 1 dermatitis; while in the match group, 76 patients developed grade 1 dermatitis, 27 patients developed grade 2 dermatitis, 5 patients developed grade 3 dermatitis, 1 patient developed grade 4 dermatitis. IMRT + CIRT treatment was associated with a significant trend of lower grades of OM and dermatitis (p < 0.05, respectively). Any severe (i.e., grade 3) chronic AEs, such as xerostomia, skin fibrosis, temporal lobe necrosis, osteoradionecrosis, or radiation-induced optic neuropathy, was not observed.

CONCLUSIONS:

In this study, IMRT + CIRT was associated with significantly reduced acute toxicity burden compared with full course of IMRT, with excellent survival outcomes. Patients with persistent disease after treatment and treated with nodal boost had a worse outcome. More accurate assessments of IMRT + CIRT to primary nonmetastatic NPC patients will be imperative.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas / Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada / Pontuação de Propensão / Radioterapia com Íons Pesados / Carcinoma Nasofaríngeo Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas / Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada / Pontuação de Propensão / Radioterapia com Íons Pesados / Carcinoma Nasofaríngeo Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article