Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Length of Stay and Discharge Disposition After Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Large Multicenter Propensity Matched Comparison of Robotic-Assisted and Manual Techniques.
Rajesh, Diviya A; Witvoet, Sietske; Coppolecchia, Andrea; Scholl, Laura; Chen, Antonia F.
Afiliação
  • Rajesh DA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Witvoet S; Stryker, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
  • Coppolecchia A; Division of Joint Replacement, Stryker Orthopaedics, Mahwah, New Jersey.
  • Scholl L; Division of Joint Replacement, Stryker Orthopaedics, Mahwah, New Jersey.
  • Chen AF; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Orthopaedics, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
J Arthroplasty ; 39(9S1): S117-S123, 2024 Sep.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38604284
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Robotic-arm assistance continues to gain popularity in total hip arthroplasty (THA) for its potential to improve component placement accuracy and patient outcomes. Nonetheless, there is limited data on the impact of robotic-assisted THA (RA-THA) on hospital length of stay (LOS) and discharge location. This study thus aimed to compare LOS, discharge location, and readmission rate for propensity-matched cohorts of RA-THA versus manual THA (M-THA).

METHODS:

A retrospective review of a multi-hospital database was performed to identify patients who underwent THA between January 2016 and December 2021 from surgeons who performed both RA-THA and M-THA at 77 geographically diverse hospitals. The RA-THA and M-THA cohorts were 1-to-1 matched based on patient sex, age, and body mass index, resulting in 8,536 patients per cohort. Insurance type, LOS, same-day discharge, discharge disposition, and 90-day all-cause readmission rate were compared using Mann-Whitney U and Chi-square tests.

RESULTS:

Average LOS was significantly shorter for RA-THA patients (1.39 ± 0.85 days) than for M-THA patients (1.48 ± 0.91 days, P < .001). Compared to 5.6% of M-THA patients, 5.3% of RA-THA patients underwent same-day discharge (P = .38). There were statistically significant differences in discharge disposition between cohorts, with more RA-THA cases discharged home without home healthcare compared to M-THA (47.9 versus 45.5%, P = .001) and fewer RA-THA cases discharged to a skilled nursing facility compared to M-THA (5.6 versus 6.9%, P = .001). The 90-day all-cause readmission rate for RA-THA cases was 3.0%, compared to 3.4% for M-THA cases (P = .26).

CONCLUSIONS:

Compared to M-THA, RA-THA had a shorter average LOS, a similar percentage of patients with same-day discharge, fewer patients who had skilled nursing facility discharge, and a similar all-cause 90-day readmission rate. These results may be of interest to surgeons participating in bundled payment programs and engaging in cost savings.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Alta do Paciente / Readmissão do Paciente / Artroplastia de Quadril / Pontuação de Propensão / Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos / Tempo de Internação Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Alta do Paciente / Readmissão do Paciente / Artroplastia de Quadril / Pontuação de Propensão / Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos / Tempo de Internação Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article