Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Utilization and quality of palliative care in patients with hematological and solid cancers: a population-based study.
Gebel, Cordula; Ditscheid, Bianka; Meissner, Franziska; Slotina, Ekaterina; Kruschel, Isabel; Marschall, Ursula; Wedding, Ullrich; Freytag, Antje.
Afiliação
  • Gebel C; Department of Palliative Care, University Hospital Jena, Friedrich-Schiller University Jena, Jena, Germany. cordula.gebel@med.uni-jena.de.
  • Ditscheid B; Comprehensive Cancer Center Central Germany (CCCG), Jena, Deutschland. cordula.gebel@med.uni-jena.de.
  • Meissner F; Institute of General Practice, University Hospital Jena, Friedrich-Schiller University Jena, Jena, Germany.
  • Slotina E; Institute of General Practice, University Hospital Jena, Friedrich-Schiller University Jena, Jena, Germany.
  • Kruschel I; Institute of General Practice, University Hospital Jena, Friedrich-Schiller University Jena, Jena, Germany.
  • Marschall U; Department of Palliative Care, University Hospital Jena, Friedrich-Schiller University Jena, Jena, Germany.
  • Wedding U; Comprehensive Cancer Center Central Germany (CCCG), Jena, Deutschland.
  • Freytag A; BARMER, Wuppertal, Germany.
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol ; 150(4): 191, 2024 Apr 12.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38607376
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Palliative care (PC) contributes to improved end-of-life care for patients with hematologic malignancies (HM) and solid tumors (ST) by addressing physical and psychological symptoms and spiritual needs. Research on PC in HM vs. ST patients is fragmented and suggests less use.

METHODS:

We analyzed claims data of all deceased members of a large German health insurance provider for the year before death. First, we analyzed the frequency and the beginning of different types of PC and compared patients with HM vs. ST. Second, we analyzed the adjusted impact of PC use on several end-of-life quality outcomes in patients with HM vs. ST. We performed simple and multiple (logistic) regression analysis, adjusted for relevant covariates, and standardized for age and sex.

RESULTS:

Of the 222,493 deceased cancer patients from 2016 to 2020, we included 209,321 in the first analysis and 165,020 in the second analysis. Patients with HM vs. ST received PC less often (40.4 vs. 55.6%) and later (34 vs. 50 days before death). PC use significantly improved all six quality indicators for good end-of-life care. HM patients had worse rates in five of the six indicators compared with ST patients. Interaction terms revealed that patients with ST derived greater benefit from PC in five of six quality indicators than those with HM.

CONCLUSION:

The data highlight the need to integrate PC more often, earlier, and more effectively into the care of patients with HM.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Assistência Terminal / Neoplasias Hematológicas Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Assistência Terminal / Neoplasias Hematológicas Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article