Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Assessing the feasibility of time in tight range (TITR) targets with advanced hybrid closed loop (AHCL) use in children and adolescents: A single-centre real-world study.
Eviz, Elif; Killi, Nesrin Ecem; Karakus, Kagan Ege; Can, Ecem; Gokce, Tugba; Yesiltepe Mutlu, Gul; Hatun, Sukru.
Afiliação
  • Eviz E; Division of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Koc University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Killi NE; Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Karakus KE; Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Can E; Division of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Koc University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Gokce T; Division of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Koc University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Yesiltepe Mutlu G; Division of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Koc University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Hatun S; Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
Diabet Med ; 41(8): e15333, 2024 Aug.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38671595
ABSTRACT

AIMS:

Time in Tight Range (TITR) is a novel glycaemic metric in monitoring type 1 diabetes (T1D) management. The aim of this study was to assess the attainability of the TITR target in children and adolescents using the advanced hybrid closed loop (AHCL).

METHODS:

The 2128-day CGM data from 56 children and adolescents with T1D using AHCL (Minimed-780G) were analysed. Time in Range (TIR) (3.9-10 mmol/L), TITR (3.9-7.7 mmol/L), and other glycaemic parameters were separately analysed in terms of whole day, daytime (06.00-2359), and nighttime (00.00-05.59) results. The participants were divided into two groups by autocorrection rate where Group 1 had a rate of <30% and Group 2 had a rate of ≥30.

RESULTS:

All glycaemic parameters indicated a better glycaemic outcome in the nighttime with higher TIR and TITR values compared with daytime (for TIR 87.5 ± 9.5% vs. 78.8 ± 8%, p < 0.001, and TITR 68.2 ± 13.5% vs. 57.5 ± 8.8%, p < 0.001). The rates of TITR >50% and >60% were 87% and 52%, respectively. When those with TITR >60% (n 29) and those without (n 27) were evaluated in terms of hypoglycaemia, no statistically significant difference was found in time below range (TBR) 3-3.9 mmol/L (0.3% vs. 2.1%, p 0.084) and TBR < 3 mmol/L (0.47% vs. 0.3%, p 0.298). Group 1 had a significantly higher TIR and TITR compared to Group 2 (82.6 ± 6.1% vs. 75.6 ± 8.6%, p 0.008 and 62.1 ± 7.5% vs. 53.8 ± 7.5%, p 0.002, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS:

Most children and adolescents on AHCL achieved the 50% target for TITR whereas more than half achieved the >60% target. A target of >50% for TITR seems realistic in children with T1D using AHCL.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Glicemia / Sistemas de Infusão de Insulina / Automonitorização da Glicemia / Estudos de Viabilidade / Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 / Hipoglicemiantes / Insulina Limite: Adolescent / Child / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Glicemia / Sistemas de Infusão de Insulina / Automonitorização da Glicemia / Estudos de Viabilidade / Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 / Hipoglicemiantes / Insulina Limite: Adolescent / Child / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article