Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Long-term outcomes of revision total hip arthroplasty with the Zimmer Modular Revision hip system.
Hickie, Kirsten L; Neufeld, Michael E; Howard, Lisa C; Greidanus, Nelson V; Masri, Bassam A; Garbuz, Donald S.
Afiliação
  • Hickie KL; Complex Joint Clinic, Vancouver, Canada.
  • Neufeld ME; Complex Joint Clinic, Vancouver, Canada.
  • Howard LC; Complex Joint Clinic, Vancouver, Canada.
  • Greidanus NV; Complex Joint Clinic, Vancouver, Canada.
  • Masri BA; Complex Joint Clinic, Vancouver, Canada.
  • Garbuz DS; Complex Joint Clinic, Vancouver, Canada.
Bone Joint J ; 106-B(5 Supple B): 112-117, 2024 May 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38688497
ABSTRACT

Aims:

There are limited long-term studies reporting on outcomes of the Zimmer Modular Revision (ZMR) stem, and concerns remain regarding failure. Our primary aim was to determine long-term survival free from all-cause revision and stem-related failure for this modular revision stem in revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). Secondary aims included evaluating radiological and functional outcomes.

Methods:

We retrospectively identified all patients in our institutional database who underwent revision THA using the ZMR system from January 2000 to December 2007. We included 106 patients (108 hips) with a mean follow-up of 14.5 years (2.3 to 22.3). Mean patient age was 69.2 years (37.0 to 89.4), and 51.9% were female (n = 55). Indications for index revision included aseptic loosening (73.1%), infection (16.7%), fracture (9.3%), and stem fracture (0.9%). Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to determine the all-cause and stem-related failure revision-free survival. At most recent follow-up, Oxford Hip Scores (OHS) were collected, and radiological stem stability was determined using the Engh classification.

Results:

A total of 17 hips (15.7%) underwent re-revision of any component. Indications for re-revision were stem failure (35.3%; n = 6), infection (29.4%; n = 5), instability (29.4%; n = 5), and acetabular aseptic loosening (5.9%; n = 1). The five- and 15-year all-cause survival was 89.7% (95% confidence interval (CI) 86.7 to 92.7) and 83.3% (95% CI 79.6 to 87.0), respectively. There were six re-revisions (5.6%) for stem failure; five for stem fracture and one for aseptic loosening. The five- and 15-year survival free from stem-related failure was 97.2% (95% CI 95.6 to 98.8) and 94.0% (95% CI 91.6 to 96.4), respectively. At final follow-up, the mean OHS was 36.9 (8.0 to 48.0) and 95.7% (n = 66) of surviving modular revision stems were well-fixed in available radiographs.

Conclusion:

Femoral revision with the ZMR offers satisfactory long-term all-cause revision-free survival, good survival free of stem-related failure, and favourable clinical outcomes. Stem fracture was the most common reason for stem-related failure and occurred both early and late. This highlights the importance of both early and long-term surveillance for stem-related failure.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Desenho de Prótese / Reoperação / Falha de Prótese / Artroplastia de Quadril / Prótese de Quadril Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Desenho de Prótese / Reoperação / Falha de Prótese / Artroplastia de Quadril / Prótese de Quadril Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article