Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Identifying necrotizing soft tissue infection using infectious fluid analysis and clinical parameters based on machine learning algorithms.
Chang, Chia-Peng; Lin, Chung-Jen; Fann, Wen-Chih; Hsieh, Chiao-Hsuan.
Afiliação
  • Chang CP; Department of Emergency Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, No. 6, W. Sec., Jiapu Rd., Puzih City, Chiayi County, 613, Taiwan.
  • Lin CJ; Department of Nursing, Chang Gung University of Science and Technology, Chiayi Campus, No.2, Sec. W., Jiapu Rd., Puzi City, Chiayi County, 613, Taiwan.
  • Fann WC; Department of Emergency Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, No. 6, W. Sec., Jiapu Rd., Puzih City, Chiayi County, 613, Taiwan.
  • Hsieh CH; Department of Emergency Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, No. 6, W. Sec., Jiapu Rd., Puzih City, Chiayi County, 613, Taiwan.
Heliyon ; 10(9): e29578, 2024 May 15.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38707339
ABSTRACT

Background:

Determining the presence of necrotizing soft tissue infection (NSTI) poses a significant hurdle. As of late, there has been a notable increase in the application of artificial intelligence (AI) machine learning techniques in identifying diseases, a shift that can be attributed to their exceptional efficiency, unbiased nature, and high precision.

Methods:

Information was gathered from a cohort of 13 patients suffering from NSTI, alongside 12 patients with cellulitis. The construction of NSTI diagnostic machine learning models utilized four different algorithms, specifically random forest, k-nearest neighbors (KNN), support vector machine (SVM), and logistic regression. These models were constructed based on 28 distinctive attributes identified through statistical examination. Following this, the diagnostic efficiency of each algorithms was evaluated. A novel random forest model, streamlined for clinical use, was later developed by focusing on 6 attributes that had the most pronounced influence on the accuracy of our initial random forest model.

Results:

The following data was noted regarding the sensitivity and specificity of the four NSTI diagnostic modelslogistic regression displayed 78.2 % and 83.7 %, KNN presented 79.1 % and 87.1 %, SVM showed 83.5 % and 86.3 %, and random forest exhibited 89.6 % and 92.9 %, respectively. In comparison, lactate levels in fluid demonstrated 100 % sensitivity and 76.9 % specificity at an optimal cut-off point of 69.6 mg/dL. Among all four machine learning models, random forest outperformed the others and also showed better results than fluid lactate. A newly constructed random forest model, created using 6 of the 13 identified features, displayed promising results in diagnosing NSTI, having a sensitivity and specificity of 90.2 % and 92.2 %, respectively.

Conclusions:

Developing a diagnostic model for NSTI employing the random forest algorithm has resulted in a diagnostic technique that is more efficient, cost-effective, and expedient. This approach could provide healthcare practitioners with the tools to identify and manage NSTI with greater efficacy.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article