Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Meta-analysis: Radial Scar and Breast MRI.
Ferre, Romuald; Covington, Matthew F; Kuzmiak, Cherie M.
Afiliação
  • Ferre R; TADH, Ontario, Canada. Electronic address: Romuald.ferre99x@gmail.com.
  • Covington MF; Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112, USA.
  • Kuzmiak CM; Professor of Radiology Faculty, Division of Breast Imaging, Department of Radiology, CB #7510, UNC School of Medicine, Physicians' Office Building, Rm #118, 170 Manning Drive, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, USA.
Acad Radiol ; 2024 May 06.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38714429
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The implementation of digital breast tomosynthesis has increased the detection of radial scar (RS). Managing this finding may be experienced as a clinical dilemma in daily practice. Breast Contrast-Enhanced MRI (CE-BMR) is a known modality in case of problem-solving tool for mammographic abnormalities. However, the data about AD and CE-BMR are scant.

OBJECTIVE:

The purpose was to estimate the benefit of CE-BMR in the setting of RS detected mammographically through a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature.

METHODS:

A search of MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were conducted in 2022. Based on the PRISMA guidelines, an analysis was performed. The primary endpoint was the correlation between CE-BMR findings and definite outcome for RS (pure RS versus RS associated with atypia or malignancy).

RESULTS:

Three studies were available. The negative predictive value (NPV) was 100% for each.

CONCLUSION:

The high NPV could allow for deferral of a biopsy in favor of a short-interval imaging follow-up in the setting of a negative CE-BMR.

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article