Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparative effectiveness and safety outcomes between denosumab and bisphosphonate in South Korea.
Park, ChulHyoung; Kim, Chungsoo; Park, Rae Woong; Jeon, Ja Young.
Afiliação
  • Park C; Department of Biomedical Informatics, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon 16499, Republic of Korea.
  • Kim C; Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510, United States.
  • Park RW; Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT 06510, United States.
  • Jeon JY; Department of Biomedical Informatics, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon 16499, Republic of Korea.
J Bone Miner Res ; 39(7): 835-843, 2024 Aug 05.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38722817
ABSTRACT
Both bisphosphonates and denosumab are the mainstays of treatment for osteoporosis to prevent fractures. However, there are still few trials directly comparing the prevention of fractures and the safety of 2 drugs in the treatment of osteoporosis. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety between denosumab and bisphosphonates using a nationwide claims database. The database was covered with 10 million, 20% of the whole Korean population sampled by age and sex stratification of the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service in South Korea. Among 228 367 subjects who were over 50 yr of age and taking denosumab or bisphosphonate from January 2018 to April 2022, the analysis was performed on 91 460 subjects after 11 propensity score matching. The primary outcome was treatment effectiveness; total fracture, major osteoporotic fracture, femur fracture, pelvic fracture, vertebral fracture, adverse drug reactions; acute kidney injury, chronic kidney disease, and atypical femoral fracture. Total fracture and osteoporotic major fracture, as the main outcomes of efficacy, were comparable in the denosumab and bisphosphonate group (HR 1.06, 95% CI, 0.98-1.15, P = .14; HR 1.13, 95% CI, 0.97-1.32, P = .12, respectively). Safety for acute kidney injury, chronic kidney disease, and atypical femoral fracture also did not show any differences between the 2 groups. In subgroup analysis according to ages, the denosumab group under 70 yr of age had a significantly lower risk for occurrences of acute kidney injury compared to the bisphosphonate group under 70 yr of age (HR 0.53, 95% CI, 0.29-0.93, P = .03). In real-world data reflecting clinical practice, denosumab and bisphosphonate showed comparable effectiveness for total fractures and major osteoporosis fractures, as well as safety regarding acute kidney injury, chronic kidney disease, and atypical femoral fracture.
This study compared the effectiveness and safety of denosumab and bisphosphonates, 2 primary treatments for osteoporosis, using a large South Korean nationwide claims database. Analysis of data from 91 460 individuals over 50 yr old showed no significant difference in preventing fractures or in safety outcomes such as kidney injury and atypical femoral fractures between the 2 drugs. However, among patients under 70, denosumab was associated with a lower risk of acute kidney injury. Overall, both medications demonstrated similar effectiveness and safety in the real-world treatment of osteoporosis.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Difosfonatos / Denosumab Limite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Difosfonatos / Denosumab Limite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article