Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Trends in HCAHPS Survey Scores, 2008-2019: A Quality Improvement Perspective.
Beckett, Megan K; Quigley, Denise D; Cohea, Christopher W; Lehrman, William G; Russ, Chelsea; Giordano, Laura A; Goldstein, Elizabeth; Elliott, Marc N.
Afiliação
  • Beckett MK; RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA.
  • Quigley DD; RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA.
  • Cohea CW; Health Services Advisory Group, Phoenix, AZ.
  • Lehrman WG; The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Baltimore, MD.
  • Russ C; Health Services Advisory Group, Phoenix, AZ.
  • Giordano LA; Health Services Advisory Group, Phoenix, AZ.
  • Goldstein E; The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Baltimore, MD.
  • Elliott MN; RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA.
Med Care ; 62(6): 416-422, 2024 Jun 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38728680
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

HCAHPS' 2008 initial public reporting, 2012 inclusion in the Hospital Value-Based Purchasing Program (HVBP), and 2015 inclusion in Hospital Star Ratings were intended to improve patient experiences.

OBJECTIVES:

Characterize pre-COVID-19 (2008-2019) trends in hospital consumer assessment of healthcare providers and systems (HCAHPS) scores. RESEARCH

DESIGN:

Describe HCAHPS score trends overall, by phase (1) initial public reporting period (2008-2013), (2) first 2 years of HVBP (2013-2015), and (3) initial HCAHPS Star Ratings reporting (2015-2019); and by hospital characteristics (HCAHPS decile, ownership, size, teaching affiliation, and urban/rural).

SUBJECTS:

A total of 3909 HCAHPS-participating US hospitals.

MEASURES:

HCAHPS summary score (HCAHPS-SS) and 9 measures.

RESULTS:

The mean 2007-2019 HCAHPS-SS improvement in most-positive-category ("top-box") responses was +5.2 percentage points/pp across all hospitals (where differences of 5pp, 3pp, and 1pp are "large," "medium," and "small"). Improvement rate was largest in phase 1 (+0.8/pp/year vs. +0.2pp/year and +0.1pp/year for phases 2 and 3, respectively). Improvement was largest for Overall Rating of Hospital (+8.5pp), Discharge Information (+7.3pp), and Nurse Communication (+6.5pp), smallest for Doctor Communication (+0.8pp). Some measures improved notably through phases 2 and 3 (Nurse Communication, Staff Responsiveness, Overall Rating of Hospital), but others slowed or reversed in Phase 3 (Communication about Medicines, Quietness). Bottom-decile hospitals improved more than other hospitals for all measures.

CONCLUSIONS:

All HCAHPS measures improved rapidly 2008-2013, especially among low-performing (bottom-decile) hospitals, narrowing the range of performance and improving scores overall. This initial improvement may reflect widespread, general quality improvement (QI) efforts in lower-performing hospitals. Subsequent slower improvement following the introduction of HVBP and Star Ratings may have reflected targeted, resource-intensive QI in higher-performing hospitals.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Satisfação do Paciente / Melhoria de Qualidade Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Satisfação do Paciente / Melhoria de Qualidade Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article