Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Flexible endoscopic intubation in emergency medicine: A mixed-methods needs assessment.
Sandefur, Benjamin J; Shappell, Eric F; Campbell, Ronna L; Brown, Calvin A; Driver, Brian E; Carlson, Jestin N; Mullan, Aidan F; Park, Yoon Soo; Tekian, Ara.
Afiliação
  • Sandefur BJ; Department of Emergency Medicine Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science Rochester Minnesota USA.
  • Shappell EF; Department of Emergency Medicine, Mass General Brigham Harvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts USA.
  • Campbell RL; Department of Emergency Medicine Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science Rochester Minnesota USA.
  • Brown CA; Department of Emergency Medicine, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center UMass Chan Medical School Burlington Massachusetts USA.
  • Driver BE; Department of Emergency Medicine Hennepin County Medical Center Minneapolis Minnesota USA.
  • Carlson JN; Department of Emergency Medicine Allegheny Health Network Erie Pennsylvania USA.
  • Mullan AF; Department of Quantitative Health Sciences Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science Rochester Minnesota USA.
  • Park YS; Department of Medical Education University of Illinois at Chicago Chicago Illinois USA.
  • Tekian A; Department of Medical Education University of Illinois at Chicago Chicago Illinois USA.
AEM Educ Train ; 8(3): e10992, 2024 Jun.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38765706
ABSTRACT

Objectives:

This needs assessment aimed to improve understanding of flexible endoscopic intubation training and practice in emergency medicine (EM), providing insights to educators and practice leaders seeking to improve education and practices.

Methods:

We conducted a multicenter, mixed-methods needs assessment of emergency physicians (EPs) incorporating focus groups and a survey. Focus groups comprised community EPs, academic EPs, and resident EPs. We analyzed focus group transcripts using grounded theory, qualitatively describing EM endoscopic intubation. The qualitative analysis shaped our survey instrument, which we deployed in cross-sectional fashion. We report survey data with descriptive statistics.

Results:

Focus groups with 13 EPs identified three themes indications for use of endoscopic intubation, factors impacting a physician's decision to endoscopically intubate, and attaining and maintaining endoscopic intubation competency. Of 257 surveyed EPs (33% response rate), 79% had received endoscopic intubation training during residency, though 82% had performed this procedure 10 or fewer times in their career. Despite 97% acknowledging the necessity of competency, only 23% felt highly confident in their ability to perform endoscopic intubation. Participants (93%) reported scarce opportunities to perform the procedure and identified factors believed to facilitate competency acquisition and maintenance, including opportunities to perform endoscopic intubation in practice (98%), local champions (93%), and performing nasopharyngoscopy (87%).

Conclusions:

While most EPs acknowledged the importance of competency in endoscopic intubation, they reported scarce procedural opportunities and commonly expressed low confidence. Further research is needed on this topic, and we propose avenues to enhance education and practices related to endoscopic intubation. These include development of robust procedural curricula, support of local champions, and incorporating nasopharyngoscopy into EM practice.

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article