Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Cell-based influenza vaccines: An effective vaccine option for under 60-year-olds.
Gärtner, Barbara C; Beier, Dietmar; Gosch, Gunther; Wahle, Klaus; Wendt, Luise; Förster, Laura-Christin; Schmidt, Kim J; Schwarz, Tino F.
Afiliação
  • Gärtner BC; Institute for Medical Microbiology and Hygiene - Saarland University Hospital, Homburg/Saar, Germany.
  • Beier D; Saxon Committee on Vaccinations (SIKO), Chemnitz, Germany.
  • Gosch G; Kinderarztpraxis am Domplatz, Magdeburg, Germany.
  • Wahle K; Medical Faculty - University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
  • Wendt L; ias-Gruppe, Leipzig, Germany.
  • Förster LC; CSL Seqirus GmbH, Munich, Germany.
  • Schmidt KJ; Xcenda GmbH, Hanover, Germany.
  • Schwarz TF; Institute of Laboratory Medicine and Vaccination Center - Klinikum Würzburg Mitte, Standort Juliusspital, Würzburg, Germany.
GMS Hyg Infect Control ; 19: Doc21, 2024.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38766639
ABSTRACT

Aim:

Seasonal influenza poses a significant burden of disease, affecting not only older adults but also individuals under the age of 60. It carries a high economic burden, mainly driven by influenza-associated productivity losses in the working population. Conventional egg-based influenza vaccines may have reduced effectiveness due to antigen adaptation in eggs. In contrast, cell-based influenza vaccines are less likely to be affected by such antigen adaptation. This review aims to present real-world data (RWD) comparing the effectiveness of quadrivalent cell-based (QIVc) and egg-based (QIVe) influenza vaccines over three consecutive seasons.

Methods:

A comprehensive review was conducted, analyzing RWD from retrospective cohort and case-control studies on the relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) of QIVc versus QIVe during the 2017/18-2019/20 seasons.

Results:

This study included six retrospective cohort studies and one case-control study, with a combined total of approximately 29 million participants. A cohort study involving people aged ≥4 years during the 2017/18 season showed a statistically significant rVE of QIVc compared to QIVe in preventing influenza-like illness, with a value of 36.2%. QIVc demonstrated statistically significant superiority over QIVe in preventing outpatient and inpatient medical encounters as observed in two cohort studies conducted during the 2018/19 and 2019/20 seasons. The rVE of QIVc compared to QIVe was found to be 7.6% in individuals aged ≥4 years and 9.5% in individuals aged ≥18 years. Three additional cohort studies conducted between 2017/18-2019/20 reported a statistically significant improvement in rVE (5.3-14.4%) of QIVc compared to QIVe in preventing influenza-related hospitalizations and emergency department visits due to influenza in individuals aged 4-64 years. In a case-control study across all three seasons, QIVc showed statistically significantly higher effectiveness compared to QIVe in preventing test-confirmed influenza, with rVEs of 10.0-14.8%.

Conclusions:

RWD from the 2017/18-2019/20 seasons demonstrated that QIVc is more effective than QIVe in preventing influenza-related outcomes in individuals aged 4-64 years. Preferential use of cell-based influenza vaccines, as opposed to conventional egg-based vaccines, could reduce the burden of influenza-related symptoms on individuals and alleviate the economic impact on the German population under 60 years of age.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article