Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The predicted benefits of genomic selection on pig breeding objectives.
Sharif-Islam, Md; van der Werf, Julius H J; Wood, Benjamin J; Hermesch, Susanne.
Afiliação
  • Sharif-Islam M; AGBU, a Joint Venture of NSW Department of Primary Industries, University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales, Australia.
  • van der Werf JHJ; School of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Wood BJ; School of Veterinary Science, The University of Queensland, Lawes, Queensland, Australia.
  • Hermesch S; AGBU, a Joint Venture of NSW Department of Primary Industries, University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales, Australia.
J Anim Breed Genet ; 2024 May 23.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38779724
ABSTRACT
The premise was tested that the additional genetic gain was achieved in the overall breeding objective in a pig breeding program using genomic selection (GS) compared to a conventional breeding program, however, some traits achieved larger gain than other traits. GS scenarios based on different reference population sizes were evaluated. The scenarios were compared using a deterministic simulation model to predict genetic gain in scenarios with and without using genomic information as an additional information source. All scenarios were compared based on selection accuracy and predicted genetic gain per round of selection for objective traits in both sire and dam lines. The results showed that GS scenarios increased overall response in the breeding objectives by 9% to 56% and 3.5% to 27% in the dam and sire lines, respectively. The difference in response resulted from differences in the size of the reference population. Although all traits achieved higher selection accuracy in GS, traits with limited phenotypic information at the time of selection or with low heritability, such as sow longevity, number of piglets born alive, pre- and post-weaning survival, as well as meat and carcass quality traits achieved the largest additional response. This additional response came at the expense of smaller responses for traits that are easy to measure, such as back fat and average daily gain in GS compared to the conventional breeding program. Sow longevity and drip loss percentage did not change in a favourable direction in GS with a reference population of 500 pigs. With a reference population of 1000 pigs or onwards, sow longevity and drip loss percentage began to change in a favourable direction. Despite the smaller responses for average daily gain and back fat thickness in GS, the overall breeding objective achieved additional gain in GS.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article