Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Assessing the Efficacy and Long-Term Outcomes of Surgical Intervention Versus Radiotherapy: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Prostate Cancer Treatment Modalities.
Waraich, Tauqir Aslam; Khalid, Syed Yousaf; Kathia, Usama Muhammad; Ali, Azfar; Qamar, Saleem Shahzad Shumas; Yousuf, Ammar; Saleem, Rana Muhammad Umair.
Afiliação
  • Waraich TA; Department of Urology, Letterkenny University Hospital, Letterkenny, IRL.
  • Khalid SY; Department of Urology, Letterkenny University Hospital, Letterkenny, IRL.
  • Kathia UM; Department of General Surgery, Letterkenny University Hospital, Letterkenny, IRL.
  • Ali A; Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, St. James's Hospital, Dublin, IRL.
  • Qamar SSS; Department of Urology and Kidney Transplantation, Lahore General Hospital, Lahore, PAK.
  • Yousuf A; Department of Urology and Kidney Transplantation, Lahore General Hospital, Lahore, PAK.
  • Saleem RMU; Department of Urology and Kidney Transplantation, Lahore General Hospital, Lahore, PAK.
Cureus ; 16(4): e58842, 2024 Apr.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38784314
ABSTRACT
There is controversy regarding the most effective primary treatment of choice for prostate cancer (PCa) in terms of patient outcomes, such as surgery or radiotherapy (RT). This study evaluated the comparative efficacy and long-term outcomes of radical prostatectomy (RP) and RT for PCa treatment. A thorough literature review of relevant databases was conducted, focusing on academic and clinical studies published from 2019 onwards. The inclusion criteria included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and other observational studies comparing survival outcomes in patients treated with surgery and RT. We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines to provide an overview of the data. We selected 19 studies based on the inclusion criteria. Of the total 19 studies, 12 advocated RP as the preferred treatment to improve survival outcomes in patients with PCa. The results of our synthesis showed that prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM) was lower in patients treated with RT. The total effect size for the analysis was calculated as Z=1.19 (p-value=0.23). The heterogeneity in the studies was as follows Tau2=0.09, Chi2=20.25, df=4, I2=80%. Moreover, overall survival (OS) was shown to be higher in patients who underwent prostatectomy. The combined effect for the analysis was found to be HR=0.97 (0.93, 1.01). The total effect was calculated as Z=1.33 (p-value= 0.18). The heterogeneity was found to be Tau2=0.00, Chi2=1.33, df=2, and I2=0%. However, overall mortality (OM) was shown to be independent of the treatment modality. RT is the preferred strategy for PCa treatment, as it balances efficacy and long-term outcomes. Clinical decision-making should consider individual patient characteristics and future research should delve into specific subpopulations and long-term outcomes to further refine the treatment guidelines.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article