Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Could Use of a Flexible and Navigable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath Be a Potential Game-changer in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery? Outcomes at 30 Days from a Large, Prospective, Multicenter, Real-world Study by the European Association of Urology Urolithiasis Section.
Gauhar, Vineet; Traxer, Olivier; Castellani, Daniele; Sietz, Christian; Chew, Ben Hall; Fong, Khi Yung; Hamri, Saeed Bin; Gökce, Mehmet Ilker; Gadzhiev, Nariman; Galosi, Andrea Benedetto; Yuen, Steffi Kar Kei; El Hajj, Albert; Ko, Raymond; Zawadzki, Marek; Sridharan, Vikram; Lakmichi, Mohamed Amine; Corrales, Mariela; Malkhasyan, Vigen; Ragoori, Deepak; Soebhali, Boyke; Tan, Karl; Chai, Chu Ann; Tursunkulov, Azimdjon N; Tanidir, Yiloren; Persaud, Satyendra; Elshazly, Mohamed; Kamal, Wissam; Tefik, Tzevat; Shrestha, Anil; Tiong, Heng Chin; Somani, Bhaskar Kumar.
Afiliação
  • Gauhar V; Department of Urology, Ng Teng Fong General Hospital, Singapore.
  • Traxer O; Department of Urology, Sorbonne University, Tenon Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France.
  • Castellani D; Urology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria delle Marche, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy. Electronic address: castellanidaniele@gmail.com.
  • Sietz C; Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
  • Chew BH; Department of Urology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
  • Fong KY; Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
  • Hamri SB; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
  • Gökce MI; Department of Urology, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Gadzhiev N; Department of Urology, St. Petersburg State University Hospital, St. Petersburg, Russia.
  • Galosi AB; Urology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria delle Marche, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy.
  • Yuen SKK; SH Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
  • El Hajj A; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
  • Ko R; Nepean Urology Research Group, Kingswood, Australia.
  • Zawadzki M; Urology Unit, St. Anna Hospital, Piaseczno, Poland.
  • Sridharan V; Urology Unit, Sree Paduka Speciality Hospital, Trichy, India.
  • Lakmichi MA; Department of Urology, University Hospital Mohammed the VIth of Marrakesh, Marrakesh, Morocco.
  • Corrales M; Department of Urology, Sorbonne University, Tenon Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France.
  • Malkhasyan V; Endourological Department, A.I. Yevdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry, Moscow, Russia.
  • Ragoori D; Department of Urology, Asian Institute of Nephrology & Urology, Hyderabad, India.
  • Soebhali B; Department of Urology, Abdul Wahab Sjahranie Hospital Medical Faculty, Muliawarman University, Samarinda, Indonesia.
  • Tan K; Department of Surgery, Section of Urology, Veterans Memorial Medical Center, Quezon City, Philippines.
  • Chai CA; Department of Surgery, Urology Unit, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
  • Tursunkulov AN; Urology Division, AkfaMedline Hospital, Tashkent, Uzbekistan.
  • Tanidir Y; Department of Urology, Marmara University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Persaud S; Division of Clinical Surgical Sciences, University of the West Indies, St. Augustine, Trinidad and Tobago.
  • Elshazly M; Urology Unit, Menoufia University, Shibin el Kom, Egypt.
  • Kamal W; Urology Unit, King Fahd General Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
  • Tefik T; Department of Urology, Istanbul University Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Shrestha A; Department of Urology, National Academy of Medical Sciences, Bir Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal.
  • Tiong HC; Department of Urology, Ng Teng Fong General Hospital, Singapore.
  • Somani BK; Department of Urology, University Hospitals Southampton, NHS Trust, Southampton, UK.
Eur Urol Focus ; 2024 May 23.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38789313
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND

OBJECTIVE:

The aim of this study was to evaluate the stone-free status (SFS) rate and complications after flexible ureteroscopy (fURS) for treatment of renal stones using a flexible and navigable suction (FANS) ureteral access sheath.

METHODS:

Data for adults undergoing fURS in 25 centers worldwide were prospectively collected (August 2023 to January 2024). Exclusion criteria were abnormal renal anatomy and ureteral stones. All patients had computed tomography scans before and within 30 d after fURS with a FANS ureteral access sheath. SFS was defined as follows grade A, zero fragments; grade B, a single fragment ≤2 mm; grade C, a single fragment 2.1-4 mm; and grade D, single/multiple fragments >4 mm. Data for continuous variables are presented as the median and interquartile range (IQR). Multivariable logistic regression was performed to evaluate predictors of grade A SFS. KEY FINDINGS AND

LIMITATIONS:

The study enrolled 394 patients (59.1% male) with a median age of 49 yr (IQR 36-61). The median stone volume was 1260 mm3 (IQR 706-1800). Thulium fiber laser (TFL) was used in 45.9% of cases and holmium laser in the rest. The median lasing time was 18 min (IQR 11-28) and the median operative time was 49 min (IQR 37-70). One patient required a blood transfusion and 3.3% of patients had low-grade fever. No patient developed sepsis. Low-grade ureteral injury occurred in eight patients (2%). The grade A SFS rate was 57.4% and the grade A + B SFS rate was 97.2%, while 2.8% of patients had grade C or D SFS. Eleven patients underwent repeat fURS. Multivariable analysis revealed that a stone volume of 1501-3000 mm3 (odds ratio 0.50) and of >3000 mm3 (odds ratio 0.29) were significantly associated with lower probability of grade A SFS, while TFL use was associated with higher SFS probability (odds ratio 1.83). Limitations include the lack of a comparative group. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS fURS using a FANS ureteral access sheath resulted in a high SFS rate with negligible serious adverse event and reintervention rates. PATIENT

SUMMARY:

We looked at 30-day results for patients undergoing telescopic laser treatment for kidney stones using a special type of vacuum-assisted sheath to remove stone fragments. We found a high stone-free rate with minimal complications.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article