Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Can Microfluidics Improve Sperm Quality? A Prospective Functional Study.
Meseguer, Fernando; Giménez Rodríguez, Carla; Rivera Egea, Rocío; Carrión Sisternas, Laura; Remohí, Jose A; Meseguer, Marcos.
Afiliação
  • Meseguer F; IVIRMA Global Research Alliance, IVIRMA Valencia, Plaza de la Policía Local 3, 46015 Valencia, Spain.
  • Giménez Rodríguez C; IVIRMA Global Research Alliance, IVI Foundation, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe (IIS La Fe), 46026 Valencia, Spain.
  • Rivera Egea R; IVIRMA Global Research Alliance, IVIRMA Valencia, Plaza de la Policía Local 3, 46015 Valencia, Spain.
  • Carrión Sisternas L; IVIRMA Global Research Alliance, IVI Foundation, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe (IIS La Fe), 46026 Valencia, Spain.
  • Remohí JA; IVIRMA Global Research Alliance, IVIRMA Valencia, Plaza de la Policía Local 3, 46015 Valencia, Spain.
  • Meseguer M; IVIRMA Global Research Alliance, IVI Foundation, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe (IIS La Fe), 46026 Valencia, Spain.
Biomedicines ; 12(5)2024 May 20.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38791093
ABSTRACT
The same sperm selection techniques in assisted reproduction clinics have remained largely unchanged despite their weaknesses. Recently, microfluidic devices have emerged as a novel methodology that facilitates the sperm selection process with promising results. A prospective case-control study was conducted in two phases 100 samples were used to compare the microfluidic device with Density Gradient, and another 100 samples were used to compare the device with the Swim-up. In the initial phase, a significant enhancement in progressive motility, total progressive motile sperm count, vitality, morphology, and sperm DNA fragmentation were obtained for the microfluidic group compared to Density Gradient. Nevertheless, no statistically significant differences were observed in sperm concentration and chromatin structure stability. In the subsequent phase, the microfluidic group exhibited significant increases in sperm concentration, total progressive motile sperm count, and vitality compared to Swim-up. However, non-significant differences were seen for progressive motility, morphology, DNA structure stability, and DNA fragmentation. Similar trends were observed when results were stratified into quartiles. In conclusion, in a comparison of microfluidics with standard techniques, an improvement in sperm quality parameters was observed for the microfluidic group. However, this improvement was not significant for all parameters.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article