Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Prognostic potential of lipid profiling in cancer patients: a systematic review of mass spectrometry-based studies.
Takanashi, Yusuke; Kahyo, Tomoaki; Sekihara, Keigo; Kawase, Akikazu; Setou, Mitsutoshi; Funai, Kazuhito.
Afiliação
  • Takanashi Y; First Department of Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, 1-20-1 Handayama, Chuo- ku, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, 431-3192, Japan. tyusuke@hama-med.ac.jp.
  • Kahyo T; Department of Cellular and Molecular Anatomy, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, 1-20-1 Handayama, Higashi Ward, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, 431-3192, Japan.
  • Sekihara K; International Mass Imaging Center, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, 1-20-1 Handayama, Chuo-ku, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, 431-3192, Japan.
  • Kawase A; First Department of Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, 1-20-1 Handayama, Chuo- ku, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, 431-3192, Japan.
  • Setou M; First Department of Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, 1-20-1 Handayama, Chuo- ku, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, 431-3192, Japan.
  • Funai K; Department of Cellular and Molecular Anatomy, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, 1-20-1 Handayama, Higashi Ward, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, 431-3192, Japan.
Lipids Health Dis ; 23(1): 154, 2024 May 25.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38796445
ABSTRACT
Cancer prognosis remains a critical clinical challenge. Lipidomic analysis via mass spectrometry (MS) offers the potential for objective prognostic prediction, leveraging the distinct lipid profiles of cancer patient-derived specimens. This review aims to systematically summarize the application of MS-based lipidomic analysis in prognostic prediction for cancer patients. Our systematic review summarized 38 studies from the past decade that attempted prognostic prediction of cancer patients through lipidomics. Commonly analyzed cancers included colorectal, prostate, and breast cancers. Liquid (serum and urine) and tissue samples were equally used, with liquid chromatography-tandem MS being the most common analytical platform. The most frequently evaluated prognostic outcomes were overall survival, stage, and recurrence. Thirty-eight lipid markers (including phosphatidylcholine, ceramide, triglyceride, lysophosphatidylcholine, sphingomyelin, phosphatidylethanolamine, diacylglycerol, phosphatidic acid, phosphatidylserine, lysophosphatidylethanolamine, lysophosphatidic acid, dihydroceramide, prostaglandin, sphingosine-1-phosphate, phosphatidylinosito, fatty acid, glucosylceramide and lactosylceramide) were identified as prognostic factors, demonstrating potential for clinical application. In conclusion, the potential for developing lipidomics in cancer prognostic prediction was demonstrated. However, the field is still nascent, necessitating future studies for validating and establishing lipid markers as reliable prognostic tools in clinical practice.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Lipidômica / Neoplasias Limite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Lipidômica / Neoplasias Limite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article