Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Environmental and economic analysis of the transformation of paper mill sludge treatment technologies in China.
Lin, Yanfei; Wei, Guoxia; Liu, Hanqiao; Li, Kai; Zhu, Yuwen; Han, Qianlong; Yang, Yunzhen; Lian, Yi.
Afiliação
  • Lin Y; College of Energy and Safety Engineering, Tianjin Chengjian University, Tianjin, 300384, China.
  • Wei G; College of Science, Tianjin Chengjian University, Tianjin, 300384, China.
  • Liu H; College of Energy and Safety Engineering, Tianjin Chengjian University, Tianjin, 300384, China.
  • Li K; College of Energy and Safety Engineering, Tianjin Chengjian University, Tianjin, 300384, China.
  • Zhu Y; College of Energy and Safety Engineering, Tianjin Chengjian University, Tianjin, 300384, China. zhuyw@tcu.edu.cn.
  • Han Q; College of Energy and Safety Engineering, Tianjin Chengjian University, Tianjin, 300384, China.
  • Yang Y; College of Energy and Safety Engineering, Tianjin Chengjian University, Tianjin, 300384, China.
  • Lian Y; Tianjin Urban Planning and Design Institute Co, Ltd, Tianjin, 300000, China.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int ; 31(26): 38251-38264, 2024 Jun.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38797756
ABSTRACT
Paper mill sludge (PMS) is featured with a high content of cellulose and hemicellulose, and using its characteristics to make paperboard can achieve a high-value utilization of PMS, which has attracted growing interest. In this study, currently prevalent landfill, incineration technologies (generating heat and electricity by incineration), and three paperboard technologies (medium density fiberboard, pulp board, and corrugated paper) were evaluated and compared via life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle costing (LCC) methods. LCA results show that the PMS-to-pulp board outperforms others with an energy conservation and emission reduction (ECER) value of - 2.86 × 10-8, while the landfill exhibits the highest overall environmental impact with an ECER value of 4.80 × 10-9. LCC results reveal that the PMS-to-pulp board delivers the highest economic profit with $257.357, while the landfill is the lowest with $ - 35.63. The PMS paperboard technologies are more economically friendly than the incineration technologies due to additional electricity/steam consumption during the PMS pre-drying process in incineration. In addition, different scenarios were set up to explore national GHG emission reduction potential by increasing paperboard technologies application rate and reducing the proportion of landfill and incineration. The scenario analysis suggests that replacing 90% of landfill and incineration ratio with PMS paperboard technologies could tremendously improve the overall emission reduction performance with - 9.08 × 1010 kg CO2 eq. This result indicates that the PMS treatment technology transformation has a significant favorable impact on the achievement of the "carbon neutrality" target.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Papel / Esgotos / Incineração País/Região como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Papel / Esgotos / Incineração País/Região como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article