Cost-effectiveness of strength exercise or aerobic exercise compared with usual care for patients with knee osteoarthritis: secondary results from a multiarm randomised controlled trial in Norway.
BMJ Open
; 14(5): e079704, 2024 May 23.
Article
em En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-38803266
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES:
To evaluate the 1-year cost-effectiveness of strength exercise or aerobic exercise compared with usual care for patients with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis (OA), from a societal and healthcare perspective.DESIGN:
Cost-effectiveness analysis embedded in a three-arm randomised controlled trial. PARTICIPANTS ANDSETTING:
A total of 161 people with symptomatic knee OA seeking Norwegian primary or secondary care were included in the analyses.INTERVENTIONS:
Participants were randomised to either 12 weeks of strength exercise (n=54), 12 weeks of aerobic exercise (n=53) or usual care (n=54). OUTCOMEMEASURES:
Quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) estimated by the EuroQol-5 Dimensions-5 Levels, and costs related to healthcare utilisation and productivity loss estimated in euros (), aggregated for 1 year of follow-up. Cost-effectiveness was expressed with mean incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). Bootstrapping was used to estimate ICER uncertainty.RESULTS:
From a 1-year societal perspective, the mean cost per patient was 7954, 8101 and 17 398 in the strength exercise, aerobic exercise and usual care group, respectively. From a 1-year healthcare perspective, the mean cost per patient was 848, 2003 and 1654 in the strength exercise, aerobic exercise and usual care group, respectively. Mean differences in costs significantly favoured strength exercise and aerobic exercise from a 1-year societal perspective and strength exercise from a 1-year healthcare perspective. There were no significant differences in mean QALYs between groups. From a 1-year societal perspective, at a willingness-to-pay threshold of 27 500, the probability of strength exercise or aerobic exercise being cost-effective was ≥98%. From a 1-year healthcare perspective, the probability of strength exercise or aerobic exercise being cost-effective was ≥97% and ≥76%, respectively.CONCLUSION:
From a 1-year societal and healthcare perspective, a 12-week strength exercise or aerobic exercise programme is cost-effective compared with usual care in patients with symptomatic knee OA. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT01682980.Palavras-chave
Texto completo:
1
Coleções:
01-internacional
Base de dados:
MEDLINE
Assunto principal:
Análise Custo-Benefício
/
Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida
/
Osteoartrite do Joelho
/
Terapia por Exercício
/
Treinamento Resistido
Limite:
Aged
/
Female
/
Humans
/
Male
/
Middle aged
País/Região como assunto:
Europa
Idioma:
En
Ano de publicação:
2024
Tipo de documento:
Article