Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Usability of an eHealth sleep education intervention for university students.
Rosenberg, Lindsay; Rigney, Gabrielle; Jemcov, Anastasija; van Voorst, Derek; Corkum, Penny.
Afiliação
  • Rosenberg L; Department of Psychology & Neuroscience, Faculty of Science, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
  • Rigney G; Appleton Institute, School of Health, Medical and Applied Sciences, Central Queensland University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
  • Jemcov A; Department of Psychology & Neuroscience, Faculty of Science, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
  • van Voorst D; Department of Psychology & Neuroscience, Faculty of Science, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
  • Corkum P; Department of Psychology & Neuroscience, Faculty of Science, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Digit Health ; 10: 20552076241260480, 2024.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38846369
ABSTRACT

Background:

It has been estimated that more than one-third of university students suffer from insomnia. Few accessible eHealth sleep education programmes exist for university students and of the ones that do exist, fewer were developed using a user-centred approach, which allows for student input to be systematically collected and utilized to provide students with a programme that they consider to be easy to use and implement and to be effective. Better Nights, Better Days-Youth (BNBD-Youth) is a four-session eHealth sleep education programme designed for youth but previously only evaluated in younger adolescents (ages 14-18 years).

Aims:

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the usability of the BNBD-Youth programme with university students using Morville's User Experience Honeycomb framework to determine if this programme would meet the needs of university students and if so what modifications would be needed.

Methods:

Canadian undergraduate students (n = 46) completed the BNBD-Youth programme. Students completed online usability questionnaires based on the seven dimensions of Morville's User Experience Honeycomb (i.e. useful, usable, valuable, credible, desirable, accessible and findable) after each session and after completion of the programme. Open- and closed-ended questions were used to obtain both quantitative and qualitative responses.

Results:

Average quantitative ratings were positive across user experience dimensions, ranging from 3.43 to 4.46 (out of 5). Qualitative responses indicated overall positive experiences with the programme. The only constructive feedback that met the criteria for revising the programme was to include more interactive features in Session 4.

Conclusions:

This study demonstrates that university students found BNBD-Youth to be a usable programme for older youth. Demonstrating usability is an essential step in developing a programme with a user-centred design that university students will want to use in the future. Once the BNBD-Youth programme is revised to create the BNBD-University (BNBD-Uni) programme, additional usability and effectiveness testing will be conducted.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article