Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparative life cycle assessment of landfill sludge treatment technologies in China.
Liu, Shiqi; Liu, Hanqiao; Wei, Guoxia; Zhu, Yuwen; Zhao, Hailong; Shi, Huizhen; Lian, Yi.
Afiliação
  • Liu S; School of Environment and Municipal Engineering, Tianjin Chengjian University, Tianjin, 300384, China.
  • Liu H; School of Environment and Municipal Engineering, Tianjin Chengjian University, Tianjin, 300384, China.
  • Wei G; School of Energy and Safety Engineering, Tianjin Chengjian University, Tianjin, 300384, China.
  • Zhu Y; School of Science, Tianjin Chengjian University, Tianjin, 300384, China.
  • Zhao H; School of Energy and Safety Engineering, Tianjin Chengjian University, Tianjin, 300384, China. zhuyw@tcu.edu.cn.
  • Shi H; State Key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and Pollution Control (SKLESPC), School of Environment, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China.
  • Lian Y; School of Energy and Safety Engineering, Tianjin Chengjian University, Tianjin, 300384, China.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int ; 31(28): 41208-41220, 2024 Jun.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38849616
ABSTRACT
Reasonable treatment of large amounts of sludge excavated from landfills has gained increasing attention due to the diminishing availability of landfill space in China. In this study, five landfill sludge (LS) treatment technologies using life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle cost (LCC) were investigated, i.e., co-incineration in coal-fired power plants (CFPP) and waste incineration power plant (WIPP), co-processing in cement kiln, bricks production, and sintering ceramsite. The LCA results demonstrate that sintering ceramsite outperforms other technologies and LCC results indicate sintering ceramsite also provides the highest economic benefit ($869.94). To further enhance environmental and economic performances of the LS treatment, the substitution of coal with natural gas and biomass can reduce Energy Conservation and Emission Reduction (ECER) index by 74% and 98%, respectively. This substitution can increase economic returns by 24% and 26%, respectively. Furthermore, national-level economic benefit and carbon emission reduction potential of different LS treatment technology alternative scenarios were assessed. Results display that a combination of 50% CFPP, 25% bricks, and 25% ceramsite (biomass) offers the highest economic gain, which is 3.02 times that of 50% CFPP and 50% cement (original case). Conversely, the replacement of 25% brick with 25% cement in the above combination result in the lowest carbon reduction, which is 9.35 times that of the original case.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Esgotos / Instalações de Eliminação de Resíduos País/Região como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Esgotos / Instalações de Eliminação de Resíduos País/Região como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article