Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Acceptability of a virtual prostate cancer survivorship care model in rural Australia: A multi-methods, single-centre feasibility pilot.
Heneka, Nicole; Chambers, Suzanne K; Schaefer, Isabelle; Carmont, Kelly; Parcell, Melinda; Wallis, Shannon; Walker, Stephen; Tuffaha, Haitham; Steele, Michael; Dunn, Jeff.
Afiliação
  • Heneka N; University of Southern Queensland, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Chambers SK; Australian Catholic University, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Schaefer I; University of Southern Queensland, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Carmont K; West Moreton Health, Ipswich, Queensland, Australia.
  • Parcell M; West Moreton Health, Ipswich, Queensland, Australia.
  • Wallis S; West Moreton Health, Ipswich, Queensland, Australia.
  • Walker S; West Moreton Health, Ipswich, Queensland, Australia.
  • Tuffaha H; University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia.
  • Steele M; Australian Catholic University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Dunn J; University of Southern Queensland, Prostate Cancer Foundation of Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Aust J Rural Health ; 2024 Jun 09.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38853378
ABSTRACT

DESIGN:

A multi-methods, single-centre pilot comprising a quasi-experimental pre-/post-test design and an exploratory qualitative study.

SETTING:

A rural Australian hospital and health service.

PARTICIPANTS:

Men newly diagnosed with localised prostate cancer who were scheduled to undergo, or had undergone, radical or robotic prostatectomy surgery within the previous 3 months. INTERVENTION The intervention comprised a 12-week virtual care program delivered via teleconference by a specialist nurse, using a pre-existing connected care platform. The program was tailored to the post-operative recovery journey targeting post-operative care, psychoeducation, problem-solving and goal setting. MAIN OUTCOME

MEASURES:

Primary

outcome:

program acceptability. SECONDARY

OUTCOMES:

quality of life; prostate cancer-related distress; insomnia severity; fatigue severity; measured at baseline (T1); immediately post-intervention (T2); and 12 weeks post-intervention (T3).

RESULTS:

Seventeen participants completed the program. The program intervention showed very high levels (≥4/5) of acceptability, appropriateness and feasibility. At T1, 47% (n = 8) of men reported clinically significant psychological distress, which had significantly decreased by T3 (p = 0.020). There was a significant improvement in urinary irritative/obstructive symptoms (p = 0.030) and a corresponding decrease in urinary function burden (p = 0.005) from T1 to T3.

CONCLUSIONS:

This pilot has shown that a tailored nurse-led virtual care program, incorporating post-surgical follow-up and integrated low-intensity psychosocial care, is both acceptable to rural participants and feasible in terms of implementation and impact on patient outcomes.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article