Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Patient perspectives on liver transplant evaluation: A qualitative study.
Strauss, Alexandra T; Brundage, Janetta; Sidoti, Carolyn N; Jain, Vedant; Gurakar, Ahmet; Mohr, Katlyn; Levan, Macey; Segev, Dorry L; Hamilton, James P; Sung, Hannah C.
Afiliação
  • Strauss AT; Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA. Electronic address: Astraus6@jhmi.edu.
  • Brundage J; Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA.
  • Sidoti CN; Department of Surgery, New York University, New York, USA.
  • Jain V; Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA; Carle Illinois College of Medicine Department, University of Illinois, Champaign, USA.
  • Gurakar A; Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA.
  • Mohr K; Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA.
  • Levan M; Department of Surgery, New York University, New York, USA.
  • Segev DL; Department of Surgery, New York University, New York, USA.
  • Hamilton JP; Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA.
  • Sung HC; Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA.
Patient Educ Couns ; 127: 108346, 2024 Oct.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38896893
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Liver transplant (LT) evaluation is a complex process for patients involving multi-step and parallel medical, surgical, and psychosocial assessments of a patient's appropriateness for transplant. Patients may experience difficulties in navigating the evaluation process, potentially leading to disengagement and resulting in further health decline or death prior to completing evaluation. We aimed to identify and characterize patients' perceptions of undergoing LT evaluation.

METHODS:

We performed fourteen 30-45 min, semi-structured interviews between 3/2021-5/2021 with patients at a large LT center. Using the constant comparison method, we individually noted themes within and across interviews and codes.

RESULTS:

Our analysis generated 5 thematic dimensions related to patient engagement (i.e., patient involvement/activation) (1) psychological impact of evaluation on patients' lives; (2) information received during evaluation; (3) prior medical experience of the patient; 4) communication between patients and transplant providers; and (5) support system of the patients. Among these dimensions, we identified 8 themes.

CONCLUSION:

LT patient engagement is a multi-dimensional component of LT evaluation that incorporates the psychological impact, information received, prior medical experience, communication, and support systems of patients. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS This work can inform targeted interventions for increasing patient engagement during the LT evaluation process.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Participação do Paciente / Entrevistas como Assunto / Transplante de Fígado / Pesquisa Qualitativa Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Participação do Paciente / Entrevistas como Assunto / Transplante de Fígado / Pesquisa Qualitativa Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article