Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Changes in Facility Share of Medicaid-insured Patients With Urologic Cancers Following Implementation of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.
Demkowicz, Patrick C; Buck, Matthew B; Nie, James; Marks, Victoria A; Wheeler, Stephanie B; Dinan, Michaela A; Gross, Cary P; Leapman, Michael S.
Afiliação
  • Demkowicz PC; Department of Urology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
  • Buck MB; Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Philadelphia, PA.
  • Nie J; Department of Urology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
  • Marks VA; Department of Urology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
  • Wheeler SB; Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.
  • Dinan MA; Yale Cancer Outcomes, Public Policy, and Effectiveness Research Center, New Haven, CT.
  • Gross CP; Yale Cancer Outcomes, Public Policy, and Effectiveness Research Center, New Haven, CT.
  • Leapman MS; Department of Urology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Yale Cancer Outcomes, Public Policy, and Effectiveness Research Center, New Haven, CT. Electronic address: Michael.leapman@yale.edu.
Urology ; 192: 19-27, 2024 Oct.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38901803
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To examine Medicaid-insurance acceptance at facilities treating urologic cancers following implementation of the Affordable Care Act (ACA).

METHODS:

We conducted a retrospective, longitudinal study with a pre-post design. We accessed 2010-2017 data from the National Cancer Database, calculating the facility-level change in proportion of urologic cancer patients with Medicaid following implementation of the ACA. We used multivariable logistic regression to assess baseline clinical and demographic factors associated with changes in the proportion of patients at a facility insured through Medicaid.

RESULTS:

We identified 630 facilities, including 287 in Medicaid expansion states and 343 in non-expansion states associated with 436,082 urologic cancer patients. The mean facility-level change in proportion of patients with Medicaid was + 5.8% (95% CI 5.0%-6.5%) in expansion states versus + 0.6% (95% CI 0.2%-0.9%) in non-expansion states. There were 179 facilities that experienced a decrease in the post-ACA period, representing 13.6% of facilities in expansion states and 40.8% in non-expansion states (P <.001). Factors associated with a decrease in proportion of urologic cancer patients insured by Medicaid included non-expansion state status (OR 8.9, 95% CI 5.3-15.6, P <.001), higher baseline proportion of patients with Medicaid (highest quartile vs lowest OR 4.6, 95% CI 2.3-9.4, P <.001) and high-income zip code (highest vs lowest quartile OR 3.1, 95% CI 1.5-6.6, P <.001).

CONCLUSION:

Urologic cancer care for Medicaid-insured Americans remains unevenly distributed across cancer care centers, even in states that expanded coverage. Our findings suggest that this variation may reflect the effort of some facilities to reduce their financial exposure to increased numbers of Medicaid patients in the wake of ACA-supported state expansions.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Medicaid / Neoplasias Urológicas / Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Medicaid / Neoplasias Urológicas / Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article