Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Examining U.S. disparities in smoking among rural versus urban women of reproductive age: 2002-2019.
Higgins, Stephen T; Erath, Tyler; Chen, Fang-Fang.
Afiliação
  • Higgins ST; Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, University of Vermont, United States; Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont, United States; Department of Psychological Science, University of Vermont, United States. Electronic address: Stephen.Higgins@uvm.edu.
  • Erath T; Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, University of Vermont, United States; Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont, United States.
  • Chen FF; Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, University of Vermont, United States; Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont, United States.
Prev Med ; 185: 108054, 2024 Aug.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38914268
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

This study is part of a programmatic investigation of rural disparities in cigarette smoking examining disparities in smoking prevalence and for the first-time quit ratios among adult women of reproductive age (18-44 years), a highly vulnerable population due to risk for multigenerational adverse effects.

METHODS:

Data came from 18 years (2002-2019) of the U.S. National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) among women (n = 280,626) categorized by rural-urban residence, pregnancy status, using weighted logistic regression models testing time trends and controlling for well-established sociodemographic predictors of smoking (race/ethnicity, education, income). Concerns regarding changes in survey methods used before 2002 and after 2019 precluded inclusion of earlier and more recent survey years in the present study.

RESULTS:

Overall smoking prevalence across years was greater in rural than urban residents (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 1.11; 95%CI, 1.07-1.15; P < .001) including those not-pregnant (AOR = 1.10; 1.07-1.14; P < .001) and pregnant (AOR = 1.29; 1.09-1.52; P < .001). Overall quit ratios across years were lower in rural than urban residents (AOR = 0.93; 0.87-0.99; P < .001) including those not-pregnant (AOR = 0.93; 0.88-1.00, P = .035) and pregnant (AOR = 0.78; 0.62-0.99; P = .039). Interactions of rural versus urban residence with study years for prevalence and quit ratios overall and by pregnancy status are detailed in the main text.

CONCLUSIONS:

These results support a longstanding and robust rural disparity in smoking prevalence among women of reproductive age including those currently pregnant and provides novel evidence that differences in smoking cessation contribute to this disparity further underscoring a need for greater access to evidence-based tobacco control and regulatory interventions in rural regions.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: População Rural / População Urbana Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans / Pregnancy País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: População Rural / População Urbana Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans / Pregnancy País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article