Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Integrating Machine Learning in Clinical Practice for Characterizing the Malignancy of Solitary Pulmonary Nodules in PET/CT Screening.
Apostolopoulos, Ioannis D; Papathanasiou, Nikolaos D; Apostolopoulos, Dimitris J; Papandrianos, Nikolaos; Papageorgiou, Elpiniki I.
Afiliação
  • Apostolopoulos ID; Department of Energy Systems, University of Thessaly, Gaiopolis Campus, 41500 Larisa, Greece.
  • Papathanasiou ND; Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Patras, 26504 Rio, Greece.
  • Apostolopoulos DJ; Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Patras, 26504 Rio, Greece.
  • Papandrianos N; Department of Energy Systems, University of Thessaly, Gaiopolis Campus, 41500 Larisa, Greece.
  • Papageorgiou EI; Department of Energy Systems, University of Thessaly, Gaiopolis Campus, 41500 Larisa, Greece.
Diseases ; 12(6)2024 Jun 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38920547
ABSTRACT
The study investigates the efficiency of integrating Machine Learning (ML) in clinical practice for diagnosing solitary pulmonary nodules' (SPN) malignancy. Patient data had been recorded in the Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Patras, in Greece. A dataset comprising 456 SPN characteristics extracted from CT scans, the SUVmax score from the PET examination, and the ultimate outcome (benign/malignant), determined by patient follow-up or biopsy, was used to build the ML classifier. Two medical experts provided their malignancy likelihood scores, taking into account the patient's clinical condition and without prior knowledge of the true label of the SPN. Incorporating human assessments into ML model training improved diagnostic efficiency by approximately 3%, highlighting the synergistic role of human judgment alongside ML. Under the latter setup, the ML model had an accuracy score of 95.39% (CI 95% 95.29-95.49%). While ML exhibited swings in probability scores, human readers excelled in discerning ambiguous cases. ML outperformed the best human reader in challenging instances, particularly in SPNs with ambiguous probability grades, showcasing its utility in diagnostic grey zones. The best human reader reached an accuracy of 80% in the grey zone, whilst ML exhibited 89%. The findings underline the collaborative potential of ML and human expertise in enhancing SPN characterization accuracy and confidence, especially in cases where diagnostic certainty is elusive. This study contributes to understanding how integrating ML and human judgement can optimize SPN diagnostic outcomes, ultimately advancing clinical decision-making in PET/CT screenings.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article