Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Outcomes of endovascular therapy for Stanford type B aortic dissection in patients with sleep apnea syndrome.
Luo, Zeng-Rong; Wang, Zhi-Sheng; Chen, Yi-Xing; Chen, Liang-Wan.
Afiliação
  • Luo ZR; Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, PR China; Key Laboratory of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (Fujian Medical University), Fujian Province, PR China.
  • Wang ZS; Department of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Fujian Medical University Affiliated Longyan First Hospital, Longyan, PR China.
  • Chen YX; Department of Cardiology, Fujian Medical University Nanping First Hospital, Nanping, PR China.
  • Chen LW; Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, PR China; Key Laboratory of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (Fujian Medical University), Fujian Province, PR China. Electronic address: chenliangwan0782@163.com.
J Vasc Surg ; 2024 Jun 24.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38925349
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

This study aimed to determine the influences of varying severity of sleep apnea syndrome (SAS) on the outcomes after thoracic endovascular aorta repair (TEVAR) in patients with Stanford type B aortic dissection (TBAD).

METHODS:

This observational study focused on individuals with TBAD plus SAS who received TEVAR between January 2018 and December 2022. Patients were divided into groups according to the results of the portable sleep-breathing monitoring systems mild SAS (MSAS) and moderate-to-severe SAS (MSSAS). Clinical profiles were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS:

A total of 121 cases with TBAD plus SAS who underwent TEVAR were enrolled in this study. Two groups were formed by stratifying these cases MSAS (74 cases) and MSSAS (47 cases). The MSSAS cases were found to be older relative to MSAS cases (51.7 ± 8.3 years vs 57.1 ± 12.8 years; P = .012) and had a higher body mass index (BMI; 25.7 ± 2.3 kg/m2vs 27.0 ± 2.3 kg/m2; P = .038). The investigation did not find any appreciable differences between the MSAS and MSSAS groups in terms of complications (endoleak, P = .403; stent-induced new entry, P >.999; and stent displacement P >.999). However, the MSSAS group exhibited a significantly higher overall mortality rate compared with the MSAS group (log-rank P = .027). The tendency continued when examining cases with Marfan syndrome combined with MSSAS, where the overall mortality rate was significantly greater compared with Marfan syndrome cases with MSAS (log-rank P = .037). The absence of a significant difference was noteworthy in the freedom from reintervention between the MSAS and MSSAS groups (log-rank P = .278). The overall mortality rate was significantly higher in MSSAS group even after adjusting for varying potential confounders in the multivariate cox regression analysis (hazard ratio [HR], 1.875; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.238-2.586; P = .012). A markedly higher rate of distal stent dilation in the MSSAS group was also observed compared with the MSAS group (HR, 2.5 mm/year [95% CI, 2-3 mm/year] vs HR, 4 mm/year [95% CI, 2.0-5.5 mm/year]; P = .029).

CONCLUSIONS:

MSSAS is associated with a significantly higher risk of overall mortality and dilation rate of the distal stent after TEVAR for TBAD patients. Hence, aggressive efforts to reverse the severity of SAS in time in these individuals seem to be necessary.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article