Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Applying enhanced recovery principles to emergency laparotomy in penetrating abdominal trauma: a case-matched study.
Fonseca, Mariana Kumaira; Rizental, Laís Borges; da Cunha, Carlos Eduardo Bastian; Baldissera, Neiva; Wagner, Mário Bernardes; Fraga, Gustavo Pereira.
Afiliação
  • Fonseca MK; Hospital de Pronto Socorro de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil. marianakumaira@gmail.com.
  • Rizental LB; State University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil. marianakumaira@gmail.com.
  • da Cunha CEB; Hospital de Pronto Socorro de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
  • Baldissera N; Hospital de Pronto Socorro de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
  • Wagner MB; Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
  • Fraga GP; Hospital de Pronto Socorro de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38940950
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

The implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery programs (ERPs) has significantly improved outcomes within various surgical specialties. However, the suitability of ERPs in trauma surgery remains unclear. This study aimed to (1) design and implement an ERP for trauma laparotomy patients; (2) assess its safety, feasibility, and efficacy; and (3) compare the outcomes of the proposed ERP with conventional practices.

METHODS:

This case-matched study prospectively enrolled hemodynamically stable patients undergoing emergency laparotomy after penetrating trauma. Patients receiving the proposed ERP were compared to historical controls who had received conventional treatment from two to eight years prior to protocol implementation. Cases were matched for age, sex, injury mechanism, extra-abdominal injuries, and trauma scores. Assessment of intervention effects were modelled using regression analysis for outcome measures, including length of hospital stay (LOS), postoperative complications, and functional recovery parameters.

RESULTS:

Thirty-six consecutive patients were enrolled in the proposed ERP and matched to their 36 historical counterparts, totaling 72 participants. A statistically significant decrease in LOS, representing a 39% improvement in average LOS was observed. There was no difference in the incidence of postoperative complications. Opioid consumption was considerably lower in the ERP group (p < 0.010). Time to resumption of oral liquid and solid intake, as well as to the removal of nasogastric tubes, urinary catheters, and abdominal drains was significantly earlier among ERP patients (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION:

The implementation of a standardized ERP for the perioperative care of penetrating abdominal trauma patients yielded a significant reduction in LOS without increasing postoperative complications. These findings demonstrate that ERPs principles can be safely applied to selected trauma patients.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article